Reviews

The American by Henry James

lynn_pugh's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad tense slow-paced

4.0

adam0k's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Not as strong as Portrait of a Lady but definitely still very funny in Henry James’ way. Americans are awfully obtrusive, but Newman is a very sympathetic character. I just adore these novels.

marll_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

5.0

lapingveno's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

This novel is effectively the international version of the same conversation that is The Great Gatsby. However, instead of discussing the distinction between old money and new money, this novel wrestles with the clash between the self-made wealth of the USA and the aristocracy of Europe.

I could gush over this novel, really. It has so much going on. The elitism of the nobility. The double-standard of a man's trying to "marry up" vs. the conduct of a "loose woman" working her way up the social ladder via hypergamy. The nobility of the "democratic" common man trumping the titular nobility of a corrupt, arrogant, wicked higher class. A commentary on the purpose of wealth. The finer points of appreciation for artwork vs. "Is there a hot chick in the painting?" And the list could go on and on!

Bravo!

alisongodfrey's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This was so boring...

nbrickman's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

I am half half when it comes to James. However- this book was horrid in my mind. I had an earache when I read it and I felt like I was underwater. The fact that he includes page long preposterous sentences that make me forget what he was saying in the first place.

And...I know this is meaningful stuff, but to me? He hardly says anything and NOTHING HAPPENS in this book.

Oy.

giulia_righi's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

un libro dove il protagonista americano viene delineato come l’eroe e la persona superiore rispetto alla vecchia aristocrazia francese con giusto un pizzico di mercificazione della donna? Bene ma non benissimo

fictionfan's review

Go to review page

4.0

Culture clash…

American nouveau riche businessman Christopher Newman has come to Europe in search of culture. Not that he’s really sure what it is, nor does he make much attempt to learn – rather he wants to acquire it, with money. It’s the American Way, and Newman’s way tells him that to buy a copy is as good as owning the original. So he finds himself in the Louvre, offering excessive sums of money to a mediocre young female artist to copy some of the great paintings there to adorn his walls. But Newman has also decided it’s time to acquire a wife, and here he wants a true original – a pearl, a work of art. A friend suggests the young widow, Madame de Cintré, daughter of generations of French and English aristocracy. Her first marriage had been arranged by her family, to a man many years older than her with whom she shared no affection, but who was suitable due to his impeccable bloodlines. But now her own family is in a state of financial decay, like so much of the old aristocracy, and may be tempted to sell her this time round for American money. And so he sets out to woo her, incidentally introducing her brother Valentin to the young artist.

This was more enjoyable than I expected a James novel to be, concentrating on the contrast between the brash money-driven society of the New World and the snobbish exclusivity of the Old, with neither showing in a particularly good light. Newman himself is a moral man by his own lights, but it seemed to me this was as much because he lacked passion as because he exercised any kind of control. His growing love for Madame de Cintré – she never really became Claire to me – comes over more in the way someone would admire a vase or a painting than a person. But then, she also has about as much passion in her as a vase, so they seem well matched.

The secondary characters – Noémie the artist and her father, Valentin, and Mme de Cintré’s horrible old hag of a mother – are much more fun. Noémie is setting out on a career of her own, a traditional one if not quite a respectable, to work herself up through society by becoming mistress to men of as high rank as her beauty can attract. Valentin is fascinated by her, but has been around society long enough to know better than to fall for her snares. The old Marquise de Bellegarde – the mother – and her equally horrid son, the current Marquis, are snobs of the first water, always on guard to ensure that nothing besmirches their ancient family name. Forced marriages and mistresses are fine, but heaven forbid that they should allow the family to be tainted by the stench of “business” – one has to maintain one’s standards, after all.

The first half is slow but quite amusing, as James reveals the characters and the society in which they operate. But suddenly it turns, unconvincingly, into a rather lifeless Gothic melodrama when the Bellegardes decide out of the blue that, after encouraging him for months, they really can’t face allowing someone with his background to marry into their family. Will Newman find a way to overcome their snobbery, or to take his revenge against them? It takes an awful long time to find out, and I found that I didn’t much care. Noémie and Valentin pretty much disappear in different way in the later stages of the book, and I felt their loss. Unlike the Bellegardes, I didn’t object to Newman’s lack of culture and blue blood, but I fear I found him a bit of a bore, and Madame de Cintré proved what I had feared all along – that she lacked any kind of independent spirit.

I’ve only read a few of James’ ghost stories before, and objected to his convoluted style and ultra-ambiguity. His style in this is much more straightforward, making it more enjoyable to read. His observations of French society are fun, but not particularly in-depth or profound – they very much feel like what they in fact are: the first relatively superficial impressions of a youthful outsider to a culture very different from his own. I felt it required a lot of suspension of disbelief. How, for example, did Newman manage to become a reasonably sophisticated man given what we are told of his background? Why did the family countenance the match in the first place? Why did Madame de Cintré, no longer a young girl at the mercy of her family, not make decisions for herself? I felt James glossed over these questions, where just a little more work would have filled in the holes.

As always, the introduction in my Oxford World’s Classics edition helped to set the book in context and the notes were helpful in explaining unfamiliar references. There is also a glossary of all the French phrases sprinkled throughout the text – very helpful for monoglots like me!

Overall, then, quite enjoyable, but flawed. However, it has left me more willing to tackle some of his later work to see if they avoid the weaknesses of this one, so I guess that means it was quite a successful read in the end.

NB This book was provided for review by the publisher, Oxford World's Classics.

www.fictionfanblog.wordpress.com

gr_ace_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This is a totally useless review because I can’t describe what I just read. I think if you like the social formalities side of thing in Jane Austen books you might like this, but the way it’s written is different, with different sort of twists and turns and an ending that was warned of early on but still surprised me (I’ll admit unpleasantly). Only other thing I can say is that I’d recommend this book to people just to introduce them to Valentin. An absolutely charming character!

vale_ntina0596's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional mysterious slow-paced

3.5