Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.76 AVERAGE
3.76 AVERAGE
Interesting to listen to during the plague. Kind of hard to fully attend to in the classic translation, though.
It's a must-read in the grand scheme of literature's-most-important-oeuvres, and it's very very naughty. It's a win-win for any reader patient enough to withstand several hundreds of pages worth of short stories about 14th cenutry sex.
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
funny
hopeful
informative
lighthearted
reflective
relaxing
sad
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
The Demogorgon?
The Decameron is a classic work of Italian literature that provides a glimpse into the cultural, social and moral norms of the 14th century. The book is comprised of 100 tales told by a group of young men and women over ten days, as they flee the plague-ridden city of Florence.
Although I did not find this as intriguing as other works of Italian literature such as [b:The Prince|28862|The Prince|Niccolò Machiavelli|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1390055828l/28862._SY75_.jpg|1335445], it still provides an entertaining read and offers a unique perspective on the values and beliefs of the time period.
It is worth noting that the book is often considered one of the earliest examples of a story collection in European literature and has influenced countless other works of fiction in the centuries since its publication.
Overall, The Decameron is an enjoyable read that offers a window into a fascinating period of Italian history and culture.
I give it an alright rating of...
3.0/5
The Decameron is a classic work of Italian literature that provides a glimpse into the cultural, social and moral norms of the 14th century. The book is comprised of 100 tales told by a group of young men and women over ten days, as they flee the plague-ridden city of Florence.
Although I did not find this as intriguing as other works of Italian literature such as [b:The Prince|28862|The Prince|Niccolò Machiavelli|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1390055828l/28862._SY75_.jpg|1335445], it still provides an entertaining read and offers a unique perspective on the values and beliefs of the time period.
It is worth noting that the book is often considered one of the earliest examples of a story collection in European literature and has influenced countless other works of fiction in the centuries since its publication.
Overall, The Decameron is an enjoyable read that offers a window into a fascinating period of Italian history and culture.
I give it an alright rating of...
3.0/5
medium-paced
Interesting to see how things that are commenly regarded as highly problematic today were a normality in the Middle Ages. Anti-feminist, but good to study. Boccaccio would thrive as a Gen-Z.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Domestic abuse, Misogyny, Rape, Violence
I had long heard good things about The Decameron as a funny and irreverent piece of medieval literature, influenced by Dante and later influencing Chaucer. The Covid-19 pandemic seemed like the perfect time to finally read it. The Decameron was written during the Black Death. Its premise is that a group of Florentine nobles quarantine in the countryside to escape the plague and tell each other 100 stories to pass the time, which all of a sudden felt like relatable content!
I did enjoy The Decameron at first. The humor aged better than I had anticipated, and (more significantly) I was entertained by the shock value of it all. A reader who imagines medieval times as prudish and repressive will be tickled by this 14th Century celebration of licentiousness and mockery of the Church. After a while, however, this grew tiresome. I never expected to criticize a medieval text for its amorality and hedonism, but half the stories in this book crossed that line for me.
Structurally, I found The Decameron to be disappointing. The outer layer that supposedly bound the stories together (the friends escaping plague) lacked character development and never connected to the stories in a particularly meaningful way. Of course, it wouldn't be fair to Boccaccio to expect his book to include literary innovations developed centuries after his time—the book's structure was fresh and innovative in the context of 14th Century Italy—but you can't go into this book with expectations of a tight, complex modern narrative. Chekhov hadn't been born yet to tell Boccaccio about his gun. This stands in contrast to one of Boccaccio's major inspirations, Dante's Divine Comedy, which also consisted of 100 discrete cantos but formed a far more cohesive whole that I found quite satisfying.
Finally, Wayne Rebhorn's translation seemed fine but was definitely a bit awkward. While I appreciated his effort to capture the variation in dialect of characters from different locations and social class, the changes in tone often felt jarring.
The best advice regarding this book is given by Boccaccio himself in his conclusion: "whoever reads through these stories can skip over those that give offense and read only those that promise delight." Boccaccio provides a helpful summary before every story, and (as mentioned above) they don't connect to a broader narrative in a clear or meaningful way, so it's easy to pick and choose. Don't try to read this cover-to-cover unless you're an academic. It'll be a lot more fun to read a few stories of interest.
I chose not to give this book a rating because I don't know what a rating of a 21st Century translation of a 14th Century Italian collection of short stories would mean. This felt like a 3-star translation of a book that gives 5-star insights into the late Medieval world, but was an overall 1-star reading experience despite a few 4-star stories.
I did enjoy The Decameron at first. The humor aged better than I had anticipated, and (more significantly) I was entertained by the shock value of it all. A reader who imagines medieval times as prudish and repressive will be tickled by this 14th Century celebration of licentiousness and mockery of the Church. After a while, however, this grew tiresome. I never expected to criticize a medieval text for its amorality and hedonism, but half the stories in this book crossed that line for me.
Structurally, I found The Decameron to be disappointing. The outer layer that supposedly bound the stories together (the friends escaping plague) lacked character development and never connected to the stories in a particularly meaningful way. Of course, it wouldn't be fair to Boccaccio to expect his book to include literary innovations developed centuries after his time—the book's structure was fresh and innovative in the context of 14th Century Italy—but you can't go into this book with expectations of a tight, complex modern narrative. Chekhov hadn't been born yet to tell Boccaccio about his gun. This stands in contrast to one of Boccaccio's major inspirations, Dante's Divine Comedy, which also consisted of 100 discrete cantos but formed a far more cohesive whole that I found quite satisfying.
Finally, Wayne Rebhorn's translation seemed fine but was definitely a bit awkward. While I appreciated his effort to capture the variation in dialect of characters from different locations and social class, the changes in tone often felt jarring.
The best advice regarding this book is given by Boccaccio himself in his conclusion: "whoever reads through these stories can skip over those that give offense and read only those that promise delight." Boccaccio provides a helpful summary before every story, and (as mentioned above) they don't connect to a broader narrative in a clear or meaningful way, so it's easy to pick and choose. Don't try to read this cover-to-cover unless you're an academic. It'll be a lot more fun to read a few stories of interest.
I chose not to give this book a rating because I don't know what a rating of a 21st Century translation of a 14th Century Italian collection of short stories would mean. This felt like a 3-star translation of a book that gives 5-star insights into the late Medieval world, but was an overall 1-star reading experience despite a few 4-star stories.
Some stories were definitely better than others. Lots of very funny and very strange vignettes. I must admit I kind of breezed over the parts where Boccaccio was describing the meals and songs and dances that the characters were involved with....wasn't that interested and these parts felt a lot more dated and medieval. The short stories themselves were often fascinating for both the content and the picture they give of life during the time.
adventurous
funny
lighthearted
reflective
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
funny
lighthearted
relaxing
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
N/A
Strong character development:
N/A
Loveable characters:
N/A
Diverse cast of characters:
N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus:
N/A