Reviews

The Box in the Woods by Maureen Johnson

hawkeye_hawkins's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

2.5 stars. It would have gotten more but the ending… the reason for the murders. Really?!?

dtnorby's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

cachinapura's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional funny mysterious sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

smartinez9's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

4/4.5 starts

I do so adore Maureen Johnson. I was in a bit of a reading slump, and this pulled me right out, literally from the first page. I love Stevie, the accurate representation of her anxious brain, her friends, and their usual inadvisable sleuthy shenanigans. While I thought the mystery lacked a bit of the Ellingham atmosphere, it kept me in suspense and at the same time provided enough clues along the way to create a believable trail. Definitely some Agatha-esque tricks were pulled off, particularly with the timeless devices described in the ending.

I particularly admire that this is one of the only series where I’ve been as invested in the flashbacks as I am in the contemporary narrative. My only complaints, and what kept it from being a 5 star like the earlier books in the series for me, were that the magic of Ellingham was absent, and David felt just...there. There was both not enough of him and too much that felt detached from the rest of the novel. I much prefer when they’re more actively partners in crime.

All in all, a satisfying follow-up to a fantastic trilogy that I don’t think many authors could pull off. While I’ll never turn down more Stevie, I will also never give up my undying hope for a conclusion to the Shades of London Series, which I’ve read so many times at this point I have parts memorized. I’m hoping the allusions to London and Jack the Ripper at the end of this work were subliminal signs that something involving Rory and Stephen is simmering in the back of Maureen’s brain.

Thank you to NetGalley, who provided me with an ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review.

nedge's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

lea_maria_gloria's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny mysterious

4.25

bzliz's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

Stevie is a fun protagonist and I enjoyed listening to this audiobook more than I enjoyed reading the previous three physical copies. I think this type of YA mystery is well suited to an audiobook format since there is generally minimal tension and, much like murder mystery parties, I don’t think the answer is meant to be solvable. 

Because we moved settings to a summer camp rather than the academy, I think some of the structure fell apart for me. It’s such an odd thing that happens in summer camp stories (and only in stories) where an adult in charge of the camp will tell one child they can bring their friends and that’s the way the author integrates known characters that form the support system around our main character. I don’t know why that bugs me so much but it’s so weird, especially for positions that interact with children. Like, you don’t want to vet these friends at all? Just one interview? They play a very small part in this anyway so I’m willing to overlook it. 

I didn’t like the mystery as much in this book either. Like Stevie notes, it’s different when the people involved aren’t all dead and gone. There’s a greater discussion that can be had about the morality of true crime content, especially of recent events rather than very old cold cases. But Stevie doesn’t completely dive into that so I won’t either. 

Over all I’d say this is a fun enough read if you’re looking for something with a mystery element but low danger. It is not necessary to read the previous three books before this one. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

gracepickering's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

3.75

emilyrose486's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny mysterious sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

antoinettepowb's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious medium-paced

4.5