Reviews tagging 'Police brutality'

Talking to Strangers by Malcolm Gladwell

81 reviews

k_ro's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

4.5

Excellent! A fascinating read, well documented and with a mound of information and great analysis of cognitive biases in humans. A must-read!

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

raisinreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

Needed to be way more critical on a lot of topics

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

easta98's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional informative tense medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

fkshg8465's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative sad medium-paced

1.0

I may be one of the few people who really dislike Malcolm Gladwell. Why do I keep trying to read Malcolm Gladwell's books? Ugh. I should really ban him from my reading list. He's a great storyteller, but to me, that's all he is. I find him lacking in critical thinking and full of biases in his writing. I find this dangerous because other people may go I may be one of the few people who really dislike Malcolm Gladwell. Why do I keep trying to read Malcolm Gladwell's books? Ugh. I should really ban him from my reading list.

He's a great storyteller, but to me, that's all he is. I find him lacking in critical thinking and full of biases in his writing. I find this dangerous because other people may go along without giving it much thought, precisely because he is a great storyteller. I'm so frustrated by his conclusions that have little or no basis. I'm sure he researched everything, and presenting facts is fine, but when he draws conclusions on those facts without backing any of it up or without having demonstrated any logic behind it, I get mad.

I find him dangerous because he leads people to his conclusions without room for doubt when he uses words like, “obviously” to jump to a conclusion that may or may not be logical and in some cases are clearly biased by western outlooks (I see it as the equivalent of mental grooming). In one chapter, he shows a picture of a face he thinks is clearly angry, but in actuality, it can be just as easily interpreted as a confused or frustrated face. Yet, because his standards of correctness is his own interpretation, and because the rest of the argument as based on it, the critical logic falls apart for me. 

I also hated that he put rape on trial. Women and victims have a hard enough time being believed, and with his dangerous way of presenting, he’s now given people more reasons to doubt.

One of my own triggers is the police epidemic in the US, and I didn’t appreciate his past treatment of this topic in the other books I’ve read by him, especially because he’s half Black. He seemed to lack sensitivity, and it angered me. He did better in this book, but I hated his treatment of trying to understand Brian Encinia from page one. I admit my own anti Gladwell biases popped up over and over again while reading the book and that it probably was a better book than it felt like for that reason. I only read this book because it was on a must-read list. Never again. Even if just to preserve my own mental health. This man triggers me more than the topics in his books. Henceforth, he’s banned from my future reading list!along without giving it much thought because he is a great storyteller. I'm so frustrated by his conclusions that have little or no basis. I'm sure he researched everything, and presenting facts is fine, but when he draws conclusions on those facts without backing any of it up or without having demonstrated any logic behind it, I get mad. he uses the same examples from book to book. Where’s his originality??

I find him dangerous because he leads people to his conclusions without room for doubt when he uses words like, “obviously” to jump to a conclusion that may or may not be logical and in some cases are clearly biased by western outlooks (I see it as the equivalent of mental grooming). In one chapter, he shows a picture of a face he thinks is clearly angry, but in actuality, it can be just as easily interpreted as a confused or frustrated face. Yet because his standards of correctness is his own interpretation, and because the rest of the argument as based on it, the critical logic falls apart for me. 

I also hated that he put rape on trial. Women and vocations have a hard enough time being believed, and with his dangerous way of presenting, he’s now given people more reasons to doubt.

One of my own triggers is the police epidemic in the US, and I didn’t appreciate his past treatment of this topic in the other books I’ve read by him, especially because he’s half Black. He seemed to lack sensitivity, and it angered me. He did better in this book, but I hated his treatment of trying to understand Brian Encinia from page one. I admit my own anti Gladwell biases popped up over and over again while reading the book and that it probably was a better book than it felt like for that reason. I only read this book because it was on a must-read list. Never again. Even if just to preserve my own mental health. This man triggers me more than the topics in his books. Henceforth, he’s banned from my future reading list!

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cartermon4's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative reflective slow-paced

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

saskiahill's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

dafni's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective sad medium-paced

3.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lindsayvale's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative reflective sad tense medium-paced

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

christcore's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Vaguely interesting, but meandering message throughout. Not sure what the thread he was trying to follow was. It was a nicely produced audiobook with actual audio from sources whenever he quoted someone else, but overall not something I'd recommend. Definitely check trigger warnings before reading.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nbeckham's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative fast-paced

4.0

Super interesting. Truly amazing audiobook, incredible production. Getting to hear quotations from the source was so cool. I’ll definitely be mulling over this for a while. The author is really unafraid to look at really touchy and difficult topics and I found myself having to temper my gut reactions which was interesting to pay attention to. Sometimes I found it hard to follow the train of thought and I don’t necessarily agree with every point but I did really find this riveting, especially in audiobook format. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings