Scan barcode
simo517l's review against another edition
4.0
Great ending to a great series. Showing the fight between Octavian and Antonius and
especially the rise of Augustus very well is the meat of the book. However, sometimes the characters become a bit to perfect, which i found to take me out for the book. Still, it is a great book and one I would heartily recommend to anyone interested in the "roman republic".
especially the rise of Augustus very well is the meat of the book. However, sometimes the characters become a bit to perfect, which i found to take me out for the book. Still, it is a great book and one I would heartily recommend to anyone interested in the "roman republic".
laurenlethbridge's review
adventurous
emotional
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
clazo's review against another edition
B-O-R-I-N-G!
This is not the right word to describe the first 85 pages of this 553 page book. WOW! I have been able to plod through boring book with good information but, this one takes the cake.
Not worth the time or effort!
This is not the right word to describe the first 85 pages of this 553 page book. WOW! I have been able to plod through boring book with good information but, this one takes the cake.
Not worth the time or effort!
valwantssapereaude's review against another edition
5.0
It was perfect for my taste. I love this book and în the end it brought me to tears.
I loved how the story was presented and the author's attempt to figure out what was really going on behind the curtains. The characters were fine, but I have some little objections, which I shall not discuss about, cuz this comment would get a lot longer. Some would say that there is too much historical information and they could not follow up the story line, but for me , a history nerd , it worked.
I loved how the story was presented and the author's attempt to figure out what was really going on behind the curtains. The characters were fine, but I have some little objections, which I shall not discuss about, cuz this comment would get a lot longer. Some would say that there is too much historical information and they could not follow up the story line, but for me , a history nerd , it worked.
tartancrusader's review against another edition
5.0
And done. What a series! What a ride! Entertaining and educational in equal measure, the depth of scholarship it took to write these seven, massive, books frankly boggles the mind. A quite astonishing piece of work and one that I will revisit again and again in years to come. An incredible achievement.
Now what?
Edit to answer: Les Miserables!
Now what?
Edit to answer: Les Miserables!
marystevens's review against another edition
5.0
The end of a magnificent series
I hated to come to the end of this series of historical novels on Rome from about 110-29 BC. McCulloch writes so well. Everything is so vivid and believable. It’s so well researched.
I hated to come to the end of this series of historical novels on Rome from about 110-29 BC. McCulloch writes so well. Everything is so vivid and believable. It’s so well researched.
rpbperry's review against another edition
5.0
I have now read Colleen McCullough's Masters of Rome series for the second time in my life. I loved it the first time around, and really savored it on the re-read. This 7th volume, Antony and Cleopatra, deals with the title characters of course, but even more so with Octavian. The series as a whole is centered around Julius Caesar... the beginning volumes lay down the immediate Roman and family history (Gaius Marius, Sulla) which shaped the conditions for Caesar's advent. This last volume seals the story and illustrates how Octavian (Augustus) was able to consolidate power, and complete the transformation of Rome from republic to empire.
McCullough of course is very biased toward Caesar. She deifies him in her stories long before he is cast as Divus Julius. This is fine with me (he is an extremely likable historical figure), but one must keep in mind that he was the quintessential populist. Yes, he was capable; yes, he was honorable. But he did move Rome from its Republican setting to something else (and perhaps that was inevitable). But one cannot dwell upon this history, draped in the superb fiction of McCullough, without drawing parallels to our own current world. Populism is a cathartic force in America presently... I'll stop short of drawing personal parallels, but we have to ask: are we moving from our traditional form of government and exchanging our mos maiorum for something else?
[Loved the series and the book!]
McCullough of course is very biased toward Caesar. She deifies him in her stories long before he is cast as Divus Julius. This is fine with me (he is an extremely likable historical figure), but one must keep in mind that he was the quintessential populist. Yes, he was capable; yes, he was honorable. But he did move Rome from its Republican setting to something else (and perhaps that was inevitable). But one cannot dwell upon this history, draped in the superb fiction of McCullough, without drawing parallels to our own current world. Populism is a cathartic force in America presently... I'll stop short of drawing personal parallels, but we have to ask: are we moving from our traditional form of government and exchanging our mos maiorum for something else?
[Loved the series and the book!]
rollytoo's review against another edition
5.0
E' lungo, ci sono un sacco di nomi che a volte si confondono, ma merita. Merita davvero.
Bellissimo!
Bellissimo!
sicklyrhetoric's review against another edition
4.0
Pacey and Brilliant. Best in Historical fiction I read in a while.
ryner's review against another edition
4.0
A largely satisfying conclusion to McCullough's phenomenal historical fiction series, Masters of Rome, all of which are immensely educational and a true joy. I recommend them as often as I can. This last focuses on the post-civil-war triumvirate of Octavian, Mark Antony (+Cleopatra) and (the barely-mentioned) Lepidus. Well done, and thank you, Ms. McCullough!