Reviews with content warning for Infidelity - The Age of Innocence

Reviews tagging 'Infidelity'

The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton

11 reviews

k8lynn's review against another edition

hopeful lighthearted slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.25

this book was a challenge to me for sure. honestly had to cliffnote the chapters after reading them. glad i gave it a try and saw it the whole way through!

why would Archer marry May after she told him to marry who he really loves? i genuinely do not understand the character motivations in this and why they're preferring unhappiness over what people will say about them.

Content Warnings

dizzymisslizzy's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional reflective sad medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Content Warnings

aaron444's review

Go to review page

challenging emotional slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Content Warnings

evangelinedellamonte's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

Content Warnings

ashsparrow's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

Content Warnings

bloomingpear's review

Go to review page

reflective sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

Content Warnings

jodar's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional reflective sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0

Nooooooooo! How can the story end like this? But it makes sense; yes, it does make sense. When I calm down and consider all the personal history and emotions that came before it, it ends well. It does end well. And throughout it is such an amazing novel, well-written and emotionally unrelenting!

So, from the start: The protagonist is Newland Archer, a young man who enjoys a secure membership in the fashionable, staid and rather shallow society of upper-class 1870s’ New York. Going against largely unspoken conventions of this society, however, can cast a member out of its ranks irrevocably. So a bitter dilemma faces Newland when he falls into a passionate, deep-felt love for a childhood friend, Ellen Olenska.

Ellen has returned from Europe estranged from her foreign husband. Although the cause of her estrangement is left unspoken – to do otherwise would be unseemly – and the fault probably lies with her husband, nonetheless Ellen is under increasing pressure to be reconciled. Marriage is a sacred institution, and upholding it is vital to society’s welfare.

Newland and Ellen face mounting temptation to start an intimate relationship and thus throw aside convention and their position in society. To do so would involve social ostracism and self-exile. During this period, while Newland is forced to distance himself from Ellen, he becomes psychologically alienated:

Outside [his internal mental ‘sanctuary’], in the scene of his actual life, he moved with a growing sense of unreality and insufficiency, blundering against familiar prejudices and traditional points of view as an absentminded man goes on bumping into the furniture of his own room. Absent⁠—that was what he was: so absent from everything most densely real and near to those about him that it sometimes startled him to find they still imagined he was there. (Chapter 26)

Towards the end of the novel we move forward 30 years, when Newland looks back at his life and considers the consequences of the choices he made. He takes great joy, satisfaction and meaning from how his life has played out. Things may have turned out differently now, he realises, as social conventions have changed; yet the new ways and the old ways each have their merits and disadvantages. With a jolt, too, he comprehends that he had underestimated an intimate’s kindly perceptiveness all along:

[The revelation] seemed to take an iron band from his heart to know that, after all, someone had guessed and pitied.... And that it should have been [her] moved him indescribably. ... To [some], no doubt, the episode was only a pathetic instance of vain frustration, of wasted forces. But was it really no more? For a long time Archer sat on a bench ... while the stream of life rolled by.... (Chapter 34)

That there are no facile answers either to life’s dilemmas of heart and duty or to the demands of the individual and of society; and that current conventions are not necessarily universally superior to those of the past – to me, these are what gives the novel a timeless greatness.

Content Warnings

yolanda_h's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

toffishay's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

I love Edith Wharton; she is quickly becoming one of my favorite writers. This plot should be so boring to me! It's a book about rich white aristocrats in 1870s New York, their "high society" troubles, and how their insulated culture prevents anyone in it from truly living. In Newland, we have a character who struggles against the bounds of his society while also finding comfort, security, and identity. In Ellen/Madame Olenska, we have a woman who was raised a little unconventionally and had her fancied nurtured in a way that set her up for failure in a world that still expected her to conform. And May is a woman who represents that old society and lives fully in it in a way that supports her and does not allow her to see what she is missing. All of these characters come together and interact in this melodrama that kept me turning the page. Wharton writes them all in a way that is so human and even when I hate Newland, I feel for him. You pity and understand him. He makes things harder for himself, but he doesn't have as many options as he would want either and there is a sadness that underlines so much of these characters and their lives. This edition had a lot of helpful endnotes and footnotes to explain the references that I did not understand. I think that Wharton is such a writer's writer as well and studying her would be so useful to those looking to tell their own stories of the human condition.

Content Warnings

annapox's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

Content Warnings

More...