Scan barcode
448 pages • first pub 1993 (editions)
ISBN/UID: None
Format: Paperback
Language: English
Publisher: Fawcett Crest
Publication date: 02 November 1999
Description
Ken Follett hits the top of his form with "The Hammer of Eden," a state-of-the-art suspense thriller to rival his best.When controversial radio talk host John Truth broadcasts a terrorist threat of a man-made earthquake, few people take it serious...
Community Reviews Summary of 415 reviews
Moods
tense 62%
mysterious 31%
dark 25%
informative 18%
challenging 12%
emotional 12%
reflective 6%
Pace
fast 31%
slow 10%
Plot- or character-driven?
Plot: 64% | A mix: 29% | Character: 5%Strong character development?
No: 58% | Yes: 23% | It's complicated: 17%Loveable characters?
No: 53% | It's complicated: 33% | N/A: 6% | Yes: 6%Diverse cast of characters?
No: 53% | Yes: 33% | It's complicated: 6% | N/A: 6%Flaws of characters a main focus?
Yes: 46% | It's complicated: 30% | No: 23%Average rating
Content Warnings
Submitted by users as part of their reviews
Graphic
Sexual content
448 pages • first pub 1993 (editions)
ISBN/UID: None
Format: Paperback
Language: English
Publisher: Fawcett Crest
Publication date: 02 November 1999
Description
Ken Follett hits the top of his form with "The Hammer of Eden," a state-of-the-art suspense thriller to rival his best.When controversial radio talk host John Truth broadcasts a terrorist threat of a man-made earthquake, few people take it serious...
Community Reviews Summary of 415 reviews
Moods
tense 62%
mysterious 31%
dark 25%
informative 18%
challenging 12%
emotional 12%
reflective 6%
Pace
fast 31%
slow 10%
Plot- or character-driven?
Plot: 64% | A mix: 29% | Character: 5%Strong character development?
No: 58% | Yes: 23% | It's complicated: 17%Loveable characters?
No: 53% | It's complicated: 33% | N/A: 6% | Yes: 6%Diverse cast of characters?
No: 53% | Yes: 33% | It's complicated: 6% | N/A: 6%Flaws of characters a main focus?
Yes: 46% | It's complicated: 30% | No: 23%Average rating
Content Warnings
Submitted by users as part of their reviews
Graphic
Sexual content