1.0

Absolutely horrible.

This book, which is described as a "non-fiction thriller" turned out to be neither. There was nothing thrilling about this book, unless you count how thrilled I was when I finished this piece of garbage.

James Patterson makes the claim that he has solved the murder of King Tut. He then proceeds to "make his case" by writing a ridiculous book that bounces between King Tut's time in approximately 1300 BC, the 1920's in the Valley of the Kings, and modern day Florida. The book contains absolutely stupid dialouge between King Tut and his child bride and is filled with situations that could NEVER been historically verified. Which probably explains why this book did not contain a single footnote or reference.

Absolute rubbish.