Scan barcode
A review by dellaporta
Mr. Darcy's Diary by Maya Slater
3.0
Where to begin... Jane Austen has certain views about the world. In her point of view, people were cleaner and more logical. They were both more innocent and calculating. They were selfish in their efforts to better themselves through, marriage and acquaintances but had no real passion.
That view is wrong. Although the marriage market among the privileged did work the way she described, the high society were hypocrites who had affairs, kept women and did all sort of 'immoral' things. They also had this enormous sense of entitlement that makes modern people wanna slap them in the face.
In that sense Maya Slater's Mr Darcy was both more real and out of character. She portrays his every bit as snobbish and aloof as Ms Austen's version but at the same time he is incredibly nosy, he participates in orgies and apart from proud he is obnoxious as well. People reading this book and expecting familiar faces will be mightily dissapointed. People reading this book on it's own merits, well it's not boring exacty but it's hardly memorable. All in all it's an average book and it's a pity because the idea and the original material if used differently could have given us something great.
I am giving it 2.5/5 and recomend only to those who are curious.
That view is wrong. Although the marriage market among the privileged did work the way she described, the high society were hypocrites who had affairs, kept women and did all sort of 'immoral' things. They also had this enormous sense of entitlement that makes modern people wanna slap them in the face.
In that sense Maya Slater's Mr Darcy was both more real and out of character. She portrays his every bit as snobbish and aloof as Ms Austen's version but at the same time he is incredibly nosy, he participates in orgies and apart from proud he is obnoxious as well. People reading this book and expecting familiar faces will be mightily dissapointed. People reading this book on it's own merits, well it's not boring exacty but it's hardly memorable. All in all it's an average book and it's a pity because the idea and the original material if used differently could have given us something great.
I am giving it 2.5/5 and recomend only to those who are curious.