3.25
challenging dark informative reflective slow-paced

Foucault is always insightful, but the problem with this collection is that the quality of the interviewers was super uneven. Sometimes they were great and pulled out new threads I hadn't thought about before, but sometimes they had fundamentally misread the original text and Foucault had to spend a long time correcting some boring misinterpretation. Definitely not a good primer on Foucault, or anything really, but there were some delicious morsels to chew on sprinkled throughout the book.