Take a photo of a barcode or cover
elenajohansen 's review for:
A Brightness Long Ago
by Guy Gavriel Kay
reflective
sad
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
I loved it, and I'm glad I took my time with it (about three weeks, reading lighter stuff concurrently at times.) I wouldn't recommend this to readers entirely new to Kay's body of work, despite thinking it's an extremely beautiful and thoughtful example of it; I still think Tigana is his best novel, and the highest-value combination of approachable and rewarding to an unfamiliar audience. This novel is deliberately slow, and intensely reflective, and at times startlingly fourth-wall breaking.
The conceit is an aging narrator looking back to his small role in a web of political intrigue during his younger years. He is the protagonist, certainly, but not the hero, as I don't even think this book has a Hero figure in it. The cast of characters that builds outward from him is rich and varied despite the relatively limited scope (some Kay books have far more POV characters than this!) and depending on your taste, some of them could certainly be more interesting, ultimately, than the protagonist. But this is where Kay's atypical structural composition shines; the narrator is the central thread of this tapestry but nowhere near the strongest, brightest, or most important. He is the narrator, rather than any of the other characters, because he is the one best positioned by events to tell the whole story.
I look forward to reading this again down the road, perhaps after I've also reread the other novels set in this cohesive alternate world; for example, it was a nice touch to revisit, briefly, the shrine with the mosaic that was so important to the Sarantium duology. I only read it once, years ago, but that location was memorable enough to recall clearly all this time later, so I look forward to discovering other connections I've missed.
The conceit is an aging narrator looking back to his small role in a web of political intrigue during his younger years. He is the protagonist, certainly, but not the hero, as I don't even think this book has a Hero figure in it. The cast of characters that builds outward from him is rich and varied despite the relatively limited scope (some Kay books have far more POV characters than this!) and depending on your taste, some of them could certainly be more interesting, ultimately, than the protagonist. But this is where Kay's atypical structural composition shines; the narrator is the central thread of this tapestry but nowhere near the strongest, brightest, or most important. He is the narrator, rather than any of the other characters, because he is the one best positioned by events to tell the whole story.
I look forward to reading this again down the road, perhaps after I've also reread the other novels set in this cohesive alternate world; for example, it was a nice touch to revisit, briefly, the shrine with the mosaic that was so important to the Sarantium duology. I only read it once, years ago, but that location was memorable enough to recall clearly all this time later, so I look forward to discovering other connections I've missed.