Scan barcode
A review by mallorypen
The Spear Cuts Through Water by Simon Jimenez
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Woooooooof what a ride this was - the writing made me think of a mix between fairytale and a dream. This felt like listening to an oral history, in both how the core story was presented and in the second-person narrative outside the inverted theater.
The highlights for me:
- This style of storytelling felt comforting, even when the subject matter got gory or disturbing. It gave the same sense as listening to a folktale, where some of the details feel nonsensical to a modern audience and you find yourself looking for and finding familiar archetypes despite some of the weirder concepts. Gods and goddesses, the anthropomorphic elements of moon and water, the heroes and antiheroes, the pacing of a journey - it all could have been told around a campfire. I also felt like the entire first song from Aida could have been applied to this story (every story, new or ancient, beggar tale, or work of art, all are tales of human failings, all are tales of love at heart).
- Keema of the Dwari tribe. What a stellar character! I did guess thatthe tribe wasn’t real but his reasons for the lie were heartbreaking and sweet. He was my favorite kind of hero - flawed, but ultimately so good. I love rooting for a good guy.
- the PURPLE BIRD. That full-circle arc was incredibly satisfying. In fact, there were several times where a callback was made and I would think to myself that this is a story that knows itself and its outcomes VERY well.
- the questionable morality of literally everyone but Keema. The moon was selfish; the tortoises were complicit as much as they were victims; the Terrors were awful but also understandable. The emperors - all of ‘em - were downright horrific, but things didn’t magically get better when their dynasty was removed.
- the framing narrative of the inverted theater and the fact that we never really knew who the narrator was, or where the old country was. I also loved the dreamlike quality - that also proved to be godlike - in that we got snippets of everyone’s thoughts as the narrative mentioned background characters.
The drawbacks:
- this was a loooooong story. I don’t think it could be shorter and still have the same impact, but it was a lot to get through.
- the deus ex machina was good (because it IS a love story) but it was also a deus ex machina. Literally.
- the entry into the story was confusing; it worked insofar that it had a dreamlike logic to it, but I spent more time than I wanted to wondering when the plot would show itself. Some of that is definitely on me as a reader, but it was something I noted early on.
- though I enjoyed the story and rated it highly, this isn’t something I can see myself picking up again to read for pleasure.
The highlights for me:
- This style of storytelling felt comforting, even when the subject matter got gory or disturbing. It gave the same sense as listening to a folktale, where some of the details feel nonsensical to a modern audience and you find yourself looking for and finding familiar archetypes despite some of the weirder concepts. Gods and goddesses, the anthropomorphic elements of moon and water, the heroes and antiheroes, the pacing of a journey - it all could have been told around a campfire. I also felt like the entire first song from Aida could have been applied to this story (every story, new or ancient, beggar tale, or work of art, all are tales of human failings, all are tales of love at heart).
- Keema of the Dwari tribe. What a stellar character! I did guess that
- the PURPLE BIRD. That full-circle arc was incredibly satisfying. In fact, there were several times where a callback was made and I would think to myself that this is a story that knows itself and its outcomes VERY well.
- the questionable morality of literally everyone but Keema. The moon was selfish; the tortoises were complicit as much as they were victims; the Terrors were awful but also understandable. The emperors - all of ‘em - were downright horrific, but things didn’t magically get better when their dynasty was removed.
- the framing narrative of the inverted theater and the fact that we never really knew who the narrator was, or where the old country was. I also loved the dreamlike quality - that also proved to be godlike - in that we got snippets of everyone’s thoughts as the narrative mentioned background characters.
The drawbacks:
- this was a loooooong story. I don’t think it could be shorter and still have the same impact, but it was a lot to get through.
- the deus ex machina was good (because it IS a love story) but it was also a deus ex machina. Literally.
- the entry into the story was confusing; it worked insofar that it had a dreamlike logic to it, but I spent more time than I wanted to wondering when the plot would show itself. Some of that is definitely on me as a reader, but it was something I noted early on.
- though I enjoyed the story and rated it highly, this isn’t something I can see myself picking up again to read for pleasure.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Body shaming, Child death, Gore, and War
Minor: Sexual content