Scan barcode
A review by stephhamp
Small Great Things by Jodi Picoult
challenging
emotional
hopeful
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
I could not put this book down. But I also could not be more confused and conflicted about a book either.
As a black woman, I knew immediately that this book was written by a white woman. The thoughts and choices that Ruth made were beyond confusing. Infuriating at times. Even during the trial, Ruth's insistence to testify, seemed so out of character for any intelligent black woman to make. Why shoot yourself in the foot and admit to a lie of omission? Throughout the book, Ruth is playing a version of identity politics within herself. The belief that if she could just explain herself, she could just go home scot-free. I know Ruth is lighter skinned and the inclusion of colorism was a good touch, but she's an educated woman who went to Yale. Have you never seen a Law & Order show? You're a nurse in a hospital for 20 years, have you no idea how racial bias works and truly think you're the exception? That made no sense to me.
I did not like the fact that Picoult tried to find common ground with Turk's character. It's conflicting because while I don't think a white supremacist character should be written as sympathetic, I know in this world many people like Turk have been rehabilitated and changed, and that's a good thing. It won't erase their actions, but many people like Turk are trying to do good. It feels like by including Turk's backstory and the passages about his pain at losing his son, the reader was meant to feel sympathy. Why should I be sympathetic to him? I also did not like the big "twist" at the end when it was revealed Brit was half-black. It was meant to be this huge hypocrisy. "Oh you hate black people, but you are black." Unfortunately, many POC hats their race, and that comes out in a myriad of ways.
I think Picoult was trying to do something I hate. Trying to make a statement that we can all get along and change despite our politics. That is not true.
Kennedy was a realistic character, and I think the character probably most like the author. A grown woman who never really looked at race until she had to. Despite being a public defender. I don't think Jodi Picoult is a bad person, or a bac writer, quite the contrary. When I say I could not put this book down, I meant it. And I find this with all of her books that I've read so far. I plan to read more. I think her intentions and hopes were pure and good. But as a black intersectional feminist, the blind spots were very glaring.
As a black woman, I knew immediately that this book was written by a white woman. The thoughts and choices that Ruth made were beyond confusing. Infuriating at times. Even during the trial, Ruth's insistence to testify, seemed so out of character for any intelligent black woman to make. Why shoot yourself in the foot and admit to a lie of omission? Throughout the book, Ruth is playing a version of identity politics within herself. The belief that if she could just explain herself, she could just go home scot-free. I know Ruth is lighter skinned and the inclusion of colorism was a good touch, but she's an educated woman who went to Yale. Have you never seen a Law & Order show? You're a nurse in a hospital for 20 years, have you no idea how racial bias works and truly think you're the exception? That made no sense to me.
I did not like the fact that Picoult tried to find common ground with Turk's character. It's conflicting because while I don't think a white supremacist character should be written as sympathetic, I know in this world many people like Turk have been rehabilitated and changed, and that's a good thing. It won't erase their actions, but many people like Turk are trying to do good. It feels like by including Turk's backstory and the passages about his pain at losing his son, the reader was meant to feel sympathy. Why should I be sympathetic to him? I also did not like the big "twist" at the end when it was revealed Brit was half-black. It was meant to be this huge hypocrisy. "Oh you hate black people, but you are black." Unfortunately, many POC hats their race, and that comes out in a myriad of ways.
I think Picoult was trying to do something I hate. Trying to make a statement that we can all get along and change despite our politics. That is not true.
Kennedy was a realistic character, and I think the character probably most like the author. A grown woman who never really looked at race until she had to. Despite being a public defender. I don't think Jodi Picoult is a bad person, or a bac writer, quite the contrary. When I say I could not put this book down, I meant it. And I find this with all of her books that I've read so far. I plan to read more. I think her intentions and hopes were pure and good. But as a black intersectional feminist, the blind spots were very glaring.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Xenophobia, Racism, Antisemitism, and Racial slurs
Moderate: Self harm