Scan barcode
A review by happea
The Importance of Being Earnest by Oscar Wilde
funny
lighthearted
relaxing
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
For being over a century-old play, The Importance of Being Earnest by Oscar Wilde presents itself as a timeless comedy that has elements of dramatic irony and satire. The title presents a play on words as it highlights the significance of having the quality of being earnest when dealing with others (i.e. familial and romantic relationships) and the importance of being named Earnest.
As someone who loves comedy, this play was entertaining (probably more so if I saw a performance of it). Not an "LOL," but more of a soft "haha" type. The romance was a bit rushed (what can you expect from a 67-page read), but the major plot-twist was truly unexpected as all of Jack's lies pertaining to him having a brother and being named Earnest became truths. In addition, I realize this was more accepted during the time, but it's hard to nonchalantly accept that Jack and Gwendolyn are now first cousins set to marry one another.
My main criticism would be the way the women (Gwendolyn and Cecily) were portrayed in the story. I won't comment on the lack of independence they have in terms of their own life decisions (oh wait, I just did) only because it's such a common occurrence from the past (and even the present). I didn't enjoy how the pair's first encounter was portrayed, seeing it as a mockery to female friendships as if they have the ability to ignorantly love and hate one another within seconds of meeting.
But maybe i'm being too earnest, I mean it is considered A Trivial Comedy for Serious People.
As someone who loves comedy, this play was entertaining (probably more so if I saw a performance of it). Not an "LOL," but more of a soft "haha" type. The romance was a bit rushed (what can you expect from a 67-page read), but the major plot-twist was truly unexpected as
My main criticism would be the way the women (Gwendolyn and Cecily) were portrayed in the story. I won't comment on the lack of independence they have in terms of their own life decisions (oh wait, I just did) only because it's such a common occurrence from the past (and even the present). I didn't enjoy how the pair's first encounter was portrayed, seeing it as a mockery to female friendships as if they have the ability to ignorantly love and hate one another within seconds of meeting.
But maybe i'm being too earnest, I mean it is considered A Trivial Comedy for Serious People.