A review by hanarama
Kaikeyi by Vaishnavi Patel

adventurous emotional reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

 
CWs: sexism, misogyny, death, violence, abandonment, infertility, abuse

*3.5*

Kaikeyi is Vaishnavi Patel’s ambitious debut novel, retelling the first part of the Ramayana from the perspective of one of its most complicated characters. The only daughter amongst seven brothers, Kaikeyi is often ignored, both by her father and by the gods themselves. What power she has, she fought tooth and nail for, and in doing so becomes a formidable warrior, advisor, diplomat, and queen.

The power and influence that she has spent a lifetime carefully cultivating is thrown off kilter as her step-son Rama begins to ascend into his own power.

I loved the first half of this book, though it moved slowly. The meandering pace gives the reader space to get to know Kaikeyi and to understand her motivations. Her flaws and virtues are presented side by side throughout her rise to power, making her feel very real.

Though most of the other characters are not given the same detail as Kaikeyi, their relationships to her feel clear. While reading, I felt connections to them through Kaikeyi. Particularly, I loved her interactions with Dasharatha. I loved how asexuality was represented in their relationship. Though she didn’t love him as a romantic partner, her love for him as a friend felt so real.

The Binding Plane was beautifully handled. Its introduction makes for an interesting dynamic between Kaikeyi and the court intrigues of Kekeya and Ayodhya. The power felt very defined, but also strong, making Kaikeyi’s use of the Binding Plane feel very impactful.

The second half lost me a little bit. While compelling and fun to read, I felt that Patel framed too much of it in black and white. This was jarring, considering the care given in the first half to portray things in shades of gray. Kaikeyi is presented initially as an ambitious, sometimes callous, sometimes caring woman, but as Rama becomes more prominent, Patel presents her as wholly in the right and Rama as wholly in the wrong. I feel like there was a way for Patel to have shown them both as complicated, whole people.

It felt too much like Patel was trying to flip the entire narrative in reverse, rather than to give more space to the female characters to be rich and interesting people. Because despite Kaikeyi’s efforts in the story to raise the station of women in Kosala, she’s really the only female character to get thorough characterization. Others like Sita and Sumitra feel very flat. Framing the major conflict between Kaikeyi and Rama as a disagreement of women’s place in society rings kind of hollow given how they seem to only matter as a concept and not so much as characters.

 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings