Scan barcode
A review by ahakuutti
The Song of Achilles by Madeline Miller
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.5
Rant incoming because there's really no other words to describe what a let down this book was and how overhyped it is. For a retelling this hyped and applauded I expected more nuance and depth than a self-indulgent and sad gay boy slash fanfic I ended up reading.
This book gave me nostalgia for old BL/mlm tropes where the main character has no personality so the female readers can self insert themselves to him more easily and the main love interest is still somehow really interested in the main character even though he has the personality of a dry rag and is overall really passive. I start to have problems with this set-up only when the writer also adds their internalized misogyny by making all the female characters obstacles and those who bring conflict against the main gay couple. This is what this book is.
I never understood what Patroclus saw in Achilles except blind adoration and what Achilles saw in Patroclus making their relationship seem extremely vapid and surface level. They're both flat cardboards who suddendly gain a personality when the original myths demand it to make the events happen and all the more nuanced and complicated characters are either women who get pushed to the sidelines, killed or made antagonistic or the other guys in the army against Troy who're also often untrustworthy or kill and rape (which our gay boys don't do because they're perfect gay boys).
I'm usually fine if retellings change some things but there has to be a certain purpose behind it; if the author decides to take out all the rape, grey morality and violence the main character's originally had but instead makes them perfect feminist gay boys and treats the few female characters like this I do think that theres some validity to criticize that.
The writing has some nice passages from time time and it's easily readable but overall I coasted through this book like in a haze and it got me out of reading slump so there's something good. My favorite moment was in the endwhere Thetis reminisced on her life and her desire for revenge against the man who had raped her, but still ending up to care for the boy which she birthed. It managed to summ up her feelings so succintly but beautifully and I immediately felt for her. The only time I cried during this book was for the injustice she had experienced but also the motherly love she still managed to feel for Achilles.
Last point and this might be more of a nitpick but I also found it weird that after the main characters grow up to be adults there's no more sex scenes between them whereas when they were teenagers the author before descriped them in quite explicit detail. Amongst all the bloodshed of the war them being intimate now as adults would have underlined more on their pure love compared to the rape and pillaging happening all around them.
This book gave me nostalgia for old BL/mlm tropes where the main character has no personality so the female readers can self insert themselves to him more easily and the main love interest is still somehow really interested in the main character even though he has the personality of a dry rag and is overall really passive. I start to have problems with this set-up only when the writer also adds their internalized misogyny by making all the female characters obstacles and those who bring conflict against the main gay couple. This is what this book is.
I never understood what Patroclus saw in Achilles except blind adoration and what Achilles saw in Patroclus making their relationship seem extremely vapid and surface level. They're both flat cardboards who suddendly gain a personality when the original myths demand it to make the events happen and all the more nuanced and complicated characters are either women who get pushed to the sidelines, killed or made antagonistic or the other guys in the army against Troy who're also often untrustworthy or kill and rape (which our gay boys don't do because they're perfect gay boys).
I'm usually fine if retellings change some things but there has to be a certain purpose behind it; if the author decides to take out all the rape, grey morality and violence the main character's originally had but instead makes them perfect feminist gay boys and treats the few female characters like this I do think that theres some validity to criticize that.
The writing has some nice passages from time time and it's easily readable but overall I coasted through this book like in a haze and it got me out of reading slump so there's something good. My favorite moment was in the end
Last point and this might be more of a nitpick but I also found it weird that after the main characters grow up to be adults there's no more sex scenes between them whereas when they were teenagers the author before descriped them in quite explicit detail. Amongst all the bloodshed of the war them being intimate now as adults would have underlined more on their pure love compared to the rape and pillaging happening all around them.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Gore and Violence
Minor: Rape and Sexual violence