You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
A review by geofrog
Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare
3.0
“Et tu, Brute?”
A tragic story of brotherhood and betrayal. I’ve been obsessed with the Caesar and Brutus dynamic for years, and I’ve always loved it when writers use story beats and themes from this play. Despite this, I have never read the play itself or have ever read up on that point in history. Julius Caesar is a historical play and tragedy by William Shakespeare first performed in 1599. In the play, Brutus joins a conspiracy led by Cassius to assassinate Julius Caesar, to prevent him from becoming a tyrant. In fiction, I love themes of brotherhood and friendship, as such, I also love themes of betrayal and tragedy. While reading If We Were Villains earlier this year, I saw this play referenced and I told myself I would finally read it despite not being too familiar with plays and Shakespeare. One thing I never expected was how reading a classic play made me feel connected to William Shakespeare and the thousands of humans who studied and acted out his work since their creation. It's a literary colorful play with diverse complex characters and raises many questions. Questions about honour, fate, tyranny, and how to combat such tyranny. Yet, it also gives us a look into the character of Brutus and how he sways back and forth between his decisions. We can see how his conflicting choices that cover many grey areas in ethical decision-making. There's a reason why even today people debate on which side was "right" and "wrong." There's lots of depth and storytelling gold in this play. Revisiting this play deepened my understanding and appreciation of it. Seeing how this play influenced culture far ahead of its time again proves Shakespeare's timelessness.
“Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.”
Part of the power of Julius Caesar, of course, is contained in the power of its poetry and speech, which have the power of moving, presenting, and showing. In speech there is also coded language and the imagery of theater and presentation. Caesar's killing is imagined as an act that will lead to representation. Antony's great speech (“Friends, Romans, countrymen”), Caesar's musings on cowardice and valor in response to death, Cassius' presentation of Caesar as a Colossus, and Antony's closing eulogy for Brutus all show the way that words and speech can present perspectives on other people. It is through words that Cassius brings Brutus into the conspiracy, it is through words that Antony incites the mob and becomes a lord of chaos, and it is through words that the events are expressed and portrayed. With this play, what I'm really stunned by is how little Julius Caesar is actually present. He does have one scene but in the others his presence is more like a minor character, then it dawned on me, maybe the focus of the play is not Julius Caesar but the politics. The central thrust is of people teaming together to stop Caesar from becoming a tyrannical ruler. At one time I would not have blamed them, my understanding of Julius Caesar is he's a despot, I know from other things l've read that I might be wrong about this. Also, in the play there is no certainty that Caesar is hungry for power, all this worry comes from other characters, mainly Cassius and Brutus and company. My only gripe with this story is how I wished the focus was more on Caesar and Brutus and their brotherhood and the betrayal itself. Despite this, the play has an excellent weight and impact to the storylines. I’d love to see this acted out one day. Julius Caesar is full of intrigue, drama and spectacle. It is loaded with brilliant speeches and memorable characters. Even the most minor of characters, like the cobbler in the play's first scene deliver witticisms worth remembering. It is classic material worthy of frequent revisiting.
“Men at some time are masters of their fates. The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves, that we are underlings.”
A tragic story of brotherhood and betrayal. I’ve been obsessed with the Caesar and Brutus dynamic for years, and I’ve always loved it when writers use story beats and themes from this play. Despite this, I have never read the play itself or have ever read up on that point in history. Julius Caesar is a historical play and tragedy by William Shakespeare first performed in 1599. In the play, Brutus joins a conspiracy led by Cassius to assassinate Julius Caesar, to prevent him from becoming a tyrant. In fiction, I love themes of brotherhood and friendship, as such, I also love themes of betrayal and tragedy. While reading If We Were Villains earlier this year, I saw this play referenced and I told myself I would finally read it despite not being too familiar with plays and Shakespeare. One thing I never expected was how reading a classic play made me feel connected to William Shakespeare and the thousands of humans who studied and acted out his work since their creation. It's a literary colorful play with diverse complex characters and raises many questions. Questions about honour, fate, tyranny, and how to combat such tyranny. Yet, it also gives us a look into the character of Brutus and how he sways back and forth between his decisions. We can see how his conflicting choices that cover many grey areas in ethical decision-making. There's a reason why even today people debate on which side was "right" and "wrong." There's lots of depth and storytelling gold in this play. Revisiting this play deepened my understanding and appreciation of it. Seeing how this play influenced culture far ahead of its time again proves Shakespeare's timelessness.
“Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.”
Part of the power of Julius Caesar, of course, is contained in the power of its poetry and speech, which have the power of moving, presenting, and showing. In speech there is also coded language and the imagery of theater and presentation. Caesar's killing is imagined as an act that will lead to representation. Antony's great speech (“Friends, Romans, countrymen”), Caesar's musings on cowardice and valor in response to death, Cassius' presentation of Caesar as a Colossus, and Antony's closing eulogy for Brutus all show the way that words and speech can present perspectives on other people. It is through words that Cassius brings Brutus into the conspiracy, it is through words that Antony incites the mob and becomes a lord of chaos, and it is through words that the events are expressed and portrayed. With this play, what I'm really stunned by is how little Julius Caesar is actually present. He does have one scene but in the others his presence is more like a minor character, then it dawned on me, maybe the focus of the play is not Julius Caesar but the politics. The central thrust is of people teaming together to stop Caesar from becoming a tyrannical ruler. At one time I would not have blamed them, my understanding of Julius Caesar is he's a despot, I know from other things l've read that I might be wrong about this. Also, in the play there is no certainty that Caesar is hungry for power, all this worry comes from other characters, mainly Cassius and Brutus and company. My only gripe with this story is how I wished the focus was more on Caesar and Brutus and their brotherhood and the betrayal itself. Despite this, the play has an excellent weight and impact to the storylines. I’d love to see this acted out one day. Julius Caesar is full of intrigue, drama and spectacle. It is loaded with brilliant speeches and memorable characters. Even the most minor of characters, like the cobbler in the play's first scene deliver witticisms worth remembering. It is classic material worthy of frequent revisiting.
“Men at some time are masters of their fates. The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves, that we are underlings.”