A review by poorlywordedbookreviews
Heaven by Mieko Kawakami

dark sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

 π™Έπš— π™·πšŽπšŠπšŸπšŽπš—, 𝚊 πšπš˜πšžπš›πšπšŽπšŽπš—-πš’πšŽπšŠπš›-πš˜πš•πš πš‹πš˜πš’ πš’πšœ πšπš˜πš›πš–πšŽπš—πšπšŽπš πšπš˜πš› πš‘πšŠπšŸπš’πš—πš 𝚊 πš•πšŠπš£πš’ 𝚎𝚒𝚎. π™Έπš—πšœπšπšŽπšŠπš 𝚘𝚏 πš›πšŽπšœπš’πšœπšπš’πš—πš, πš‘πšŽ πšŒπš‘πš˜πš˜πšœπšŽπšœ 𝚝𝚘 πšœπšžπšπšπšŽπš› πš’πš— πšœπš’πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ. πšƒπš‘πšŽ πš˜πš—πš•πš’ πš™πšŽπš›πšœπš˜πš— πš πš‘πš˜ πšžπš—πšπšŽπš›πšœπšπšŠπš—πšπšœ πš πš‘πšŠπš πš‘πšŽ πš’πšœ πšπš˜πš’πš—πš πšπš‘πš›πš˜πšžπšπš‘ πš’πšœ 𝚊 πšπšŽπš–πšŠπš•πšŽ πšŒπš•πšŠπšœπšœπš–πšŠπšπšŽ, π™Ίπš˜πš“πš’πš–πšŠ, πš πš‘πš˜ πšŽπš‘πš™πšŽπš›πš’πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽπšœ πšœπš’πš–πš’πš•πšŠπš› πšπš›πšŽπšŠπšπš–πšŽπš—πš 𝚊𝚝 πšπš‘πšŽ πš‘πšŠπš—πšπšœ 𝚘𝚏 πš‘πšŽπš› πš‹πšžπš•πš•πš’πšŽπšœ. π™Ώπš›πš˜πšŸπš’πšπš’πš—πš πšŽπšŠπšŒπš‘ πš˜πšπš‘πšŽπš› πš πš’πšπš‘ πš’πš–πš–πšŽπšŠπšœπšžπš›πšŠπš‹πš•πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš—πšœπš˜πš•πšŠπšπš’πš˜πš— 𝚊𝚝 𝚊 πšπš’πš–πšŽ πš’πš— πšπš‘πšŽπš’πš› πš•πš’πšŸπšŽπšœ πš πš‘πšŽπš— πšπš‘πšŽπš’ πš—πšŽπšŽπš πš’πš πš–πš˜πšœπš, πšπš‘πšŽ 𝚝𝚠𝚘 πš’πš˜πšžπš—πš πšπš›πš’πšŽπš—πšπšœ πšπš›πš˜πš  πšŒπš•πš˜πšœπšŽπš› πšπš‘πšŠπš— πšŽπšŸπšŽπš›. π™±πšžπš πš πš‘πšŠπš, πšžπš•πšπš’πš–πšŠπšπšŽπš•πš’, πš’πšœ πšπš‘πšŽ πš—πšŠπšπšžπš›πšŽ 𝚘𝚏 𝚊 πšπš›πš’πšŽπš—πšπšœπš‘πš’πš™ πš πš‘πšŽπš— πš’πš˜πšžπš› πšœπš‘πšŠπš›πšŽπš πš‹πš˜πš—πš πš’πšœ πšπšŽπš›πš›πš˜πš›
   
What a bizarre book. The children are all unbelievably articulate philosophers, so if realism is your bag, beware. I don’t know Japanese culture well enough to know when the total absence of adults, the drive for conformity, and the hyperstoic silent suffering is veering from realistic to point making stylistic choice - and this made me alternate wildly between confusion, rage, frustration. 
   
It deftly captures certain aspects of bullying, related to the how, why, the impact and the reaction to.  Of the two MCs, Kojimo’s arc rang as more complete and nuanced. There are some heart-rendingly accurate vignettes on the isolation, and the consumptive dangers of identifying with your suffering in certain ways. But the psychopathic nature of the main bullies felt lazy, most bullying is done by far less disassociated individuals. I also felt it really needed to spend some time on how the bullying starts, that insidious creep of power imbalances, the way self preservation tactics become subverted and used against people. It felt like it’s philosophising was purely on the outcome not the process, which might have been the aim, but isn’t as meaningful out of context. 
   
As a prompt to think about morality, bullying, submission, personal agency and control, it’s a great book. As a story of the main character’s arc it felt hollow behind the surface, intense, sadness - meaning it unfortunately gave me echoes of misery porn at times. 
   
Am I glad I read it? Yes. Should you read it? Probably. Did I enjoy it? No. I just don’t think I can vibe with the nihilism.