Scan barcode
A review by bibliorama
A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L'Engle
adventurous
challenging
emotional
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Enjoyment - 4
This brought back good memories from my childhood. I didn't read much (I liked to play outside more and make up stories, but I think I just wasn't very good at picking books that I'd like), but this was one of the early books in my reading journey that I remember being mindblown at the ending. The imagery of all the children bouncing the balls at the same time became a core memory. Rereading it, I think it actually held up to what I remembered reading as a kid. It didn't disappoint or fall a part, which I give it major credit for. I don't think I could same the same for other books that I enjoyed during this era. . .
Start - 3.75
The start wasn't slow, but it's also not the most interesting part of the book. It does what it needs, but I wouldn't say it goes above and beyond. I do remember thinking it was a slog to get through when I was younger, can't say my kid brain was accurate in that because it went by super fast this time around.
Characters - 4
I don't have as much to say here. I liked the main three overall, though Charles Wallace sometimes got on my nerves. I'll leave it at that.
Atmosphere - 4
The descriptions of Meg's bedroom and of the Murry house were so comforting and cozy. That ended up being on of my favorite parts.
Plot - 4
The most interesting part of the book in my opinion. I almost wish there was more time spent on Camazotz because it's so ominous and spooky. When the kids were there, that was when I felt the most tension and fear for them, even though I knew how it ended.
Ending - 3.75
Effective in what needs to be done, but also very quick.
Style - 3.5
Simple and easy to read.
Overall - 4 rounded up
This brought back good memories from my childhood. I didn't read much (I liked to play outside more and make up stories, but I think I just wasn't very good at picking books that I'd like), but this was one of the early books in my reading journey that I remember being mindblown at the ending. The imagery of all the children bouncing the balls at the same time became a core memory. Rereading it, I think it actually held up to what I remembered reading as a kid. It didn't disappoint or fall a part, which I give it major credit for. I don't think I could same the same for other books that I enjoyed during this era. . .
Start - 3.75
The start wasn't slow, but it's also not the most interesting part of the book. It does what it needs, but I wouldn't say it goes above and beyond. I do remember thinking it was a slog to get through when I was younger, can't say my kid brain was accurate in that because it went by super fast this time around.
Characters - 4
I don't have as much to say here. I liked the main three overall, though Charles Wallace sometimes got on my nerves. I'll leave it at that.
Atmosphere - 4
The descriptions of Meg's bedroom and of the Murry house were so comforting and cozy. That ended up being on of my favorite parts.
Plot - 4
The most interesting part of the book in my opinion. I almost wish there was more time spent on Camazotz because it's so ominous and spooky. When the kids were there, that was when I felt the most tension and fear for them, even though I knew how it ended.
Ending - 3.75
Effective in what needs to be done, but also very quick.
Style - 3.5
Simple and easy to read.
Overall - 4 rounded up