Take a photo of a barcode or cover
A review by angieinbooks
The Other Bennet Sister by Janice Hadlow
2.75
The Other Bennet Sister is my second Mary Bennet Pride and Prejudice retelling this year, which is odd because I'd never read a Mary Bennet story before this year. But it also means I get to compare the two stories and I preferred The Unlikely Pursuit of Mary Bennet more than I liked this book. And, yes, the other one is sapphic and this one most definitely isn't, but it's also because that one felt like a much more original work and it seemed that Lindz McLeod actually likes the source material when I'm not sure Janice Hadlow does.
On the topic of originality... I wrote about this in my recent review of Pride and Porters that I'm always interested in how people adapt Austen. What do they keep? What to they borrow? And writing a work of historical fiction is hard because it requires--I believe--a writer tap into the language of the era. And Janice Hadlow borrows too much from Austen, IMO, in ways that really took me out of the text. It's a fine balance, but I don't think she quite got it right.
On the topic of actually liking Austen's Pride and Prejudice... Why does Hadlow do Elizabeth Bennet so dirty in this book? I get that Mary's experience with Elizabeth may not be the same as the reader's but people who are reading this book are likely fans of Pride and Prejudice and Elizabeth Bennet is a major reason why. And Charlotte Lucas/Collins comes off even worse. I don't want to come into a retelling and think differently about characters I adore. It was an odd choice.
BBC is apparently adapting this into a miniseries, which is why I wanted to read it. And I did think it was interesting. But I'd much rather have Lindz McLeod's Mary Bennet 100 times over than Hadlow's Mary Bennet.
On the topic of originality... I wrote about this in my recent review of Pride and Porters that I'm always interested in how people adapt Austen. What do they keep? What to they borrow? And writing a work of historical fiction is hard because it requires--I believe--a writer tap into the language of the era. And Janice Hadlow borrows too much from Austen, IMO, in ways that really took me out of the text. It's a fine balance, but I don't think she quite got it right.
On the topic of actually liking Austen's Pride and Prejudice... Why does Hadlow do Elizabeth Bennet so dirty in this book? I get that Mary's experience with Elizabeth may not be the same as the reader's but people who are reading this book are likely fans of Pride and Prejudice and Elizabeth Bennet is a major reason why. And Charlotte Lucas/Collins comes off even worse. I don't want to come into a retelling and think differently about characters I adore. It was an odd choice.
BBC is apparently adapting this into a miniseries, which is why I wanted to read it. And I did think it was interesting. But I'd much rather have Lindz McLeod's Mary Bennet 100 times over than Hadlow's Mary Bennet.