A review by richardbakare
Anti-Intellectualism in American Life by Richard Hofstadter

informative inspiring reflective tense slow-paced

4.5

Richard Hofstadter’s 1964 book on America’s anti-intellectualist tendencies remains pertinent even today. An undercurrent of opinion, amplified by Fox News, has become today’s realpolitik. 60 years since the initial publication and intellectuals face a deepening divide with the broader population. The internet, intended to increase the accessibility of information, has instead created echo chambers of misinformation.

Hofstadter’s well-written, smarty structured, and relatively accessible book establishes clear a definition of anti-intellectualism up front. While also drawing a distinction between intelligence and intellect. These revealing definitions  highlight why we easily confuse the focused and intelligent neurosurgeon with the inquisitive and intellectual philosopher. Hofstadter also explores how political parties have been shaped by responses to along with the embracing of intellectualism.

The clear understanding that can be gleaned from this book is that Intellectualism isn’t naturally industrious. America rejects old-world class rule in favor of rugged industrialism; even if it’s amoral. Intellectuals are useful only in so far as their pursuits serve the capitalist goals of others. Whereas Intellectual solutions take time, even centuries. Industrious and populous actions provide immediate gratification and fleeting results. Hofstadter concludes that intellectual ability without human attributes is admirable only in the same way as a chess prodigy’s brilliance. In short, intellectual pursuits are impractical for America’s hustle culture.  

After reading this you will see that it is no wonder that cults and fads thrive in America. The country seeks quick fixes to problems and will not embrace the long slog of introspection that leads to solving root issues. Anti-intellectualism is also a reaction to modernity’s push against entrenched beliefs. The book’s only flaw is its limited exploration of how America’s history of slavery and racism fueled anti-intellectualism. Otherwise a must, but marathon, read.