Scan barcode
A review by pluviosity
Angels & Demons by Dan Brown
2.0
Hm.. just a little tiny bit better than Da Vinci Code, I guess.
Some people said Dan Brown still writing novel with a poor research background, I won't agree or disagree with it.
For sure, I know that Dan Brown knows more about Illuminati and Rome Catholic Church than I do.
Yet, after Da Vinci Code and this, even I know that more than halves of the 'fact' can't be true, just another hoo-haa conspiracy theory; and *that* is where Dan Brown failed. He didn't mix fact and fiction good enough to make people like me believe.
I have to say Brown did a good job in describing the personal conflict of Carmalengo, Mortati, and even Sylvia the CERN secretary; but not Robert Langdon, I still can't like this character, I don't know why.
Although, even it's off the topic I still have to say this:
I like the film better.
At least it got Ewan McGregor (on cloak!) in it.
And at least, Ron Howard is smart enough to not force asex romance scene in it.
Some people said Dan Brown still writing novel with a poor research background, I won't agree or disagree with it.
For sure, I know that Dan Brown knows more about Illuminati and Rome Catholic Church than I do.
Yet, after Da Vinci Code and this, even I know that more than halves of the 'fact' can't be true, just another hoo-haa conspiracy theory; and *that* is where Dan Brown failed. He didn't mix fact and fiction good enough to make people like me believe.
I have to say Brown did a good job in describing the personal conflict of Carmalengo, Mortati, and even Sylvia the CERN secretary; but not Robert Langdon, I still can't like this character, I don't know why.
Although, even it's off the topic I still have to say this:
I like the film better.
At least it got Ewan McGregor (on cloak!) in it.
And at least, Ron Howard is smart enough to not force a