A review by branson
Exhalation by Ted Chiang

2.0

A friend once told me that they "read science fiction for the ideas." Unfortunately, Chiang made me realize that I don't read science fiction for only the ideas.

The environments, plots points, and characters felt as if they exclusively served the purpose of fulfilling a thought experiment. And yes, there are some genuinely provoking ideas throughout the book. Some of the ideas will stick with me, but I wish they would have a better flavor in my memory.

So packaging can be theater. And for me - in a book, it should be. I might read for ideas, but I also read for fun. I read for investment in characters and to feel the tension and release of a good story. If I want to fully appreciate an idea, I would like to engage with it beyond the scope of a thought experiment. I'm looking to engage with new situations through scenery, emotion, and made up people that I want to learn about.

An explanation packaged into a parable engages only one of the many senses I use to consume a story; the concepts of Exhalation carry weight, but the way they have been formed is one dimensional.