Scan barcode
A review by mmz
Professor Chandra Follows His Bliss by Rajeev Balasubramanyam
4.0
I'm not sure what bliss Professor Chandra is following, or how he's following it, but he's an interesting guy to read about. A distinguished professor of economics, has just been denied the Nobel Prize (again), he is hit by a bicycle and suffers a heart attack, forcing him to take a break, under doctor's orders. And he does try. He tries to reconnect with his children, and attends a mindfulness retreat. He learns a lot about himself, and his children, but I didn't really see where the bliss comes in, since he's mostly just as conflicted at the end as he is in the beginning, if a bit gentler about it.
Bliss, not so much, but Chandra himself does come to understand and accept a lot about himself and his past mistakes. His journey, with all its missteps and imperfections, is very believable, and you'll find yourself rooting for Chandra to find a way, not to bliss, but to more happiness. Or maybe just contentment? Or self-awareness? Whatever he's on the path to, it's an enjoyable journey, for the reader, at least.
One thing that really stood out to me is the very subtle way that Balasubramanyam points out the ways in which Chandra was a terrible father. His casual cruelties to his children are reported as straight facts; there is no extended narrative exposition explaining the effects of his words, allowing readers to make their own judgments without interference. This is a mark of a good author, one who truly shows, rather than tells, and he does this with aplomb throughout the book.
Bliss, not so much, but Chandra himself does come to understand and accept a lot about himself and his past mistakes. His journey, with all its missteps and imperfections, is very believable, and you'll find yourself rooting for Chandra to find a way, not to bliss, but to more happiness. Or maybe just contentment? Or self-awareness? Whatever he's on the path to, it's an enjoyable journey, for the reader, at least.
One thing that really stood out to me is the very subtle way that Balasubramanyam points out the ways in which Chandra was a terrible father. His casual cruelties to his children are reported as straight facts; there is no extended narrative exposition explaining the effects of his words, allowing readers to make their own judgments without interference. This is a mark of a good author, one who truly shows, rather than tells, and he does this with aplomb throughout the book.