Take a photo of a barcode or cover
sandysmith 's review for:
Lord of the Flies
by William Golding
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
I find classic books really hard to review. They are classics for a reason, but the language is dated, and the racial slurs (native Americans troupes) make it hard and uncomfortable to read at times. The story itself, boys on a desert island going feral, is interesting, and I'm sure the book when it was first published in the 1950s would have been shocking. It's a philosophical read that certainly makes you think. The main themes are leadership styles, power-hungry seekers, civilisation or lack thereof, the deterioration into chaos, good and bad/evil, adventures, bullying plot twists, and loads of symbolism. Yet again, I dislike the fatism and cultural misrepresentation, which may have been more acceptable in the 1950s. I can imagine and remember this book being dissected to death in English classes. Certainly, it's taken me 35-plus years to read it again and without the dissection of a bored teacher. I enjoyed it more this time round for that reason. The over riding feeling is one of the disappointment of the out of control cruel boys, which is very sad.
Graphic: Animal death, Bullying, Child death, Fatphobia, Violence, Murder
Moderate: Racial slurs, Racism, War