boomerlusink 's review for:

Rant by Chuck Palahniuk
1.0

Odd that in many cases, form is the saving grace of a book, while the content is lackluster. In this case, the content was... interesting, if nothing else, but the form was- for me- mind-numbingly indigestible. I hated reading this book. Hated, mostly, that it was just interesting enough for me to convince myself I should just power through. Also, I'm not immediately turned off by provocative writing- I'm a fan of Stephen King who often opts for a shock and awe approach to writing, which reasonably is not for everyone- but the provocations in this book were so devoid of meaning, as if perhaps to suggest that value lies in nihilistic, meaningless evocations of disgust and horror? I don't think so. I enjoy engaging with feelings of disgust and horror evoked by many forms of media, specifically because it has some sort of cathartic value. Not so here.

Just wasn't for me.