You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

saraeliz's profile picture

saraeliz 's review for:

2.0

Unfortunately this interesting idea in historical mystery writing was not given due attention by it's editor/s and publishers. It suffers greatly from inconsistencies, incongruities, and jumps in logic and conversation. Even more unfortunate is that it is first in a series and thus incredibly off-putting. I am a character driven mystery fan, and I can see the basis for an intriguing mystery solving duo, so as yet am undecided if I'll try the next in the series. Perhaps the editors actually did their job in the next?