Take a photo of a barcode or cover
reflectivereader 's review for:
Later
by Stephen King
Stephen King’s "Later" stands amidst a cloud of divided sentiment. Part supernatural thriller, part crime novel, it is a curious blend that intrigues as much as it frustrates. With a well-conceptualized plotline and King's trademark creepiness, it has its share of strengths, but it also exhibits certain shortcomings—recycling of themes and an incest subplot that feels oddly thrown in—that somewhat mar the overall presentation.
The action of "Later" revolves around Jamie Conklin, a young boy with the eerie ability to see and communicate with the dead. Raised by a single mother who is struggling to keep her literary agency afloat, Jamie's supernatural gift becomes a useful tool for his mother's cop friend, a hardened detective named Liz.
In one of the darkest instances, Jamie is enlisted to extract information from the specter of a deceased bomber to prevent a future attack. It's these experiences that frame the book's oft-repeated and cryptically terse title phrase: "Later." Indeed, everything, even the deepest secrets of the dead, are known "later."
However, much of the novel felt as though King has pieced together fragments of incomplete stories. The off-the-cuff feel left the narrative feeling disjointed and enigmatic. The repeated references to "IT," his earlier and highly acclaimed work, felt like an unnecessary deep-dive into familiar territories rather than attempting to break new ground. Compounding this was an inexplicable incest subplot that felt out of sync with the primary narrative, contributing little to the main storyline and producing more confusion than shock value.
Yet, despite its flaws, King’s masterful storytelling does shine through at moments. There are sequences in the novel, typical of his work, that create a lingering sense of unease and suggest the spine-chilling horrors that lay in wait. The character of Jamie is genuinely interesting, and his narrative voice—casual yet cryptic—is compelling. The exploration of Jamie's paranormal abilities gives rise to several chilling encounters that illustrate King’s unquestionable prowess in writing horror.
"Later" is a mixed offering from Stephen King. While it might not match up to many of his iconic works, it does provide occasional chills and a seemingly original concept. For readers looking for a solidly frightful tale, it might miss the mark. However, die-hard fans of King might still find it interesting to see how he weaves fragments of old and new narratives into a patchwork scenario. It is a classic case of a promising premise marred by an uncertain narrative, making it a book that might have polarizing effects on its readers.
The action of "Later" revolves around Jamie Conklin, a young boy with the eerie ability to see and communicate with the dead. Raised by a single mother who is struggling to keep her literary agency afloat, Jamie's supernatural gift becomes a useful tool for his mother's cop friend, a hardened detective named Liz.
In one of the darkest instances, Jamie is enlisted to extract information from the specter of a deceased bomber to prevent a future attack. It's these experiences that frame the book's oft-repeated and cryptically terse title phrase: "Later." Indeed, everything, even the deepest secrets of the dead, are known "later."
However, much of the novel felt as though King has pieced together fragments of incomplete stories. The off-the-cuff feel left the narrative feeling disjointed and enigmatic. The repeated references to "IT," his earlier and highly acclaimed work, felt like an unnecessary deep-dive into familiar territories rather than attempting to break new ground. Compounding this was an inexplicable incest subplot that felt out of sync with the primary narrative, contributing little to the main storyline and producing more confusion than shock value.
Yet, despite its flaws, King’s masterful storytelling does shine through at moments. There are sequences in the novel, typical of his work, that create a lingering sense of unease and suggest the spine-chilling horrors that lay in wait. The character of Jamie is genuinely interesting, and his narrative voice—casual yet cryptic—is compelling. The exploration of Jamie's paranormal abilities gives rise to several chilling encounters that illustrate King’s unquestionable prowess in writing horror.
"Later" is a mixed offering from Stephen King. While it might not match up to many of his iconic works, it does provide occasional chills and a seemingly original concept. For readers looking for a solidly frightful tale, it might miss the mark. However, die-hard fans of King might still find it interesting to see how he weaves fragments of old and new narratives into a patchwork scenario. It is a classic case of a promising premise marred by an uncertain narrative, making it a book that might have polarizing effects on its readers.