Scan barcode
A review by laurenzokro
Weimar Culture: The Outsider as Insider by Peter Gay
challenging
informative
reflective
slow-paced
3.75
This book is incredible in its ability to capture every different dynamic and perspective seen in the years of Weimar Germany. I think to appreciate the nuances that it gets into, it does require a bit more familiarity with the period than even the "Short History" section that the tail end of the book supplies (though it does provide a fairly impressive summary that condenses a lot of important information into just a few pages.) Gay is able to incorporate commentary, direct quotes from leading culture practitioners of the time period, and examine the general trends that played out in an incredibly unified fashion for a time that was in many ways characterised by its disarray and the obscurity faced by the general population.
Perhaps what Gay's book contributes most is a variety of incredibly appropriate sources that you would never otherwise encounter, even if having taken in the past a course that focused on 20th century Germany (which I did in university). It was undeniably rich in terms of content from leading historians, literary practitioners, and other creatives from the time period while also examining sources that would likely be a bit more challenging to come across today.
My main gripe was the fact that the references and examples were much more historian and political/economic theory-heavy than I would've liked it to be - I personally would've enjoyed more discussion about the progression of the fine arts over this time period (sculpture, painting, theatre, etc), which I had assumed would be much more present in the book based on the novel's cover and the blurb I read when I initially purchased it. While such topics were present, they were referenced more in passing rather than being explored in the depth and detail I would've appreciated to see.
Nevertheless, I think that the framing of Gay's analysis of Weimar culture was executed well. While the language and general semantics could be a bit more elaborate than I felt was necessary at times (perhaps reflective of the time in which it was written), its content was largely accessible in terms of how Gay explicitly defined his central thesis in the into and kept referencing it with direct phrasing (namely "outsider" and "insider") that appeared all throughout the book. It kept the analysis unified without being simplistic, and I felt was really able to get at the complexity and shifting nature of Weimar that remains so characteristic of the political period and the culture within it.
Perhaps what Gay's book contributes most is a variety of incredibly appropriate sources that you would never otherwise encounter, even if having taken in the past a course that focused on 20th century Germany (which I did in university). It was undeniably rich in terms of content from leading historians, literary practitioners, and other creatives from the time period while also examining sources that would likely be a bit more challenging to come across today.
My main gripe was the fact that the references and examples were much more historian and political/economic theory-heavy than I would've liked it to be - I personally would've enjoyed more discussion about the progression of the fine arts over this time period (sculpture, painting, theatre, etc), which I had assumed would be much more present in the book based on the novel's cover and the blurb I read when I initially purchased it. While such topics were present, they were referenced more in passing rather than being explored in the depth and detail I would've appreciated to see.
Nevertheless, I think that the framing of Gay's analysis of Weimar culture was executed well. While the language and general semantics could be a bit more elaborate than I felt was necessary at times (perhaps reflective of the time in which it was written), its content was largely accessible in terms of how Gay explicitly defined his central thesis in the into and kept referencing it with direct phrasing (namely "outsider" and "insider") that appeared all throughout the book. It kept the analysis unified without being simplistic, and I felt was really able to get at the complexity and shifting nature of Weimar that remains so characteristic of the political period and the culture within it.