Take a photo of a barcode or cover
misskitty14 's review for:
Crook Manifesto
by Colson Whitehead
adventurous
challenging
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
"Survival meant manipulating flaws and outwitting the system."
Crook Manifesto is definitely going to have a negative influence on me, especially considering what is happening in 2025.
Much like Harlem Shuffle, Crook Manifesto explores the evolution of Harlem (and New York) through the life of Ray Carney. Taking place in the 1970s, Carney and his neighborhood are suffering major trials and tribulations. The promises of black equality and progress that manifested themselves in the 1960s are clearly an illusion a decade later. How Carney, Harlem, and (black) New York adjust to these transformations (or better yet, continued hardships) is the central question of the novel.
Personally, the novel picks up once we get to "Part 2: Nefertiti TNT." By that point, I was better able to handle the sudden pov changes (Whitehead switches without any heads up) and ignore all the city details (unless you know the space, it is simply overwhelming information that adds nothing). While it was nice to get Munson back and his adventure with Carney sets up later developments, it took most of that section to adjust to Whitehead's style. For those well-versed in the layout of Harlem, the details of streets and cross-streets will matter, but the rest of us will not understand the significance of this; it's simply a fact.
As someone vaguely familiar with 1970s history and New York's struggle during that time, I enjoyed how Whitehead threaded these larger processes into the personal narratives. I also liked that Whitehead incorporated Pepper more (I don't remember him being a fixture in Harlem Shuffle). Carney is very much trying to move past his crooked inclinations under the assumption that he is above it/no longer needs to lean on these traits for survival (He's "come along way."). By contrast, Pepper recognizes that it is the one constant in life; the details of crime and criminals might change, but they will always exist. Pepper is comforted by this knowledge while Carney is trying to reject this premise. As Carney learns by the end of the novel, ignorance isn't something he can afford and it only makes one vulnerable to forces and systems designed to take advantage of the poor/minorities (not even the Dumas Club's association with black wealth saved it from destruction )
In many ways, Whitehead's Harlem series is reminiscent of Walter Mosley's Easy Rawlins series. They examine how larger historical forces greatly shaped the black urban experience and do so in a way that doesn't feel like a history lesson.
Crook Manifesto is definitely going to have a negative influence on me, especially considering what is happening in 2025.
Much like Harlem Shuffle, Crook Manifesto explores the evolution of Harlem (and New York) through the life of Ray Carney. Taking place in the 1970s, Carney and his neighborhood are suffering major trials and tribulations. The promises of black equality and progress that manifested themselves in the 1960s are clearly an illusion a decade later. How Carney, Harlem, and (black) New York adjust to these transformations (or better yet, continued hardships) is the central question of the novel.
Personally, the novel picks up once we get to "Part 2: Nefertiti TNT." By that point, I was better able to handle the sudden pov changes (Whitehead switches without any heads up) and ignore all the city details (unless you know the space, it is simply overwhelming information that adds nothing). While it was nice to get Munson back and his adventure with Carney sets up later developments, it took most of that section to adjust to Whitehead's style. For those well-versed in the layout of Harlem, the details of streets and cross-streets will matter, but the rest of us will not understand the significance of this; it's simply a fact.
As someone vaguely familiar with 1970s history and New York's struggle during that time, I enjoyed how Whitehead threaded these larger processes into the personal narratives. I also liked that Whitehead incorporated Pepper more (I don't remember him being a fixture in Harlem Shuffle). Carney is very much trying to move past his crooked inclinations under the assumption that he is above it/no longer needs to lean on these traits for survival (He's "come along way."). By contrast, Pepper recognizes that it is the one constant in life; the details of crime and criminals might change, but they will always exist. Pepper is comforted by this knowledge while Carney is trying to reject this premise. As Carney learns by the end of the novel, ignorance isn't something he can afford and it only makes one vulnerable to forces and systems designed to take advantage of the poor/minorities (
In many ways, Whitehead's Harlem series is reminiscent of Walter Mosley's Easy Rawlins series. They examine how larger historical forces greatly shaped the black urban experience and do so in a way that doesn't feel like a history lesson.