Scan barcode
A review by donnaeve
The Blue Tattoo: The Life of Olive Oatman by Margot Mifflin
5.0
I agree with Elmore Leonard, this book was a winner.
The main point behind this particular book (because there have been many about the Oatman massacre) was to try and dispel the sensationalistic story that surrounded this (poor) woman once she was returned back to the "whites" from the Mohaves. When she left, her "adoptive mother" Topeka, cried. There is speculation, that similar to Cynthia Parker, Olive Oatman (OO) didn't want to come back to white society. There is good evidence that OO had assimilated, and was, to the best of her ability in her circumstances, happy. One way Mifflin suggests this possibility is the tattoo on OO's chin. This is done for members of the tribe (Mohave) and for no other reason. When getting the tattoo, one has to not move the mouth so as to not smudge or mar the markings for a certain period and one has to lie very still, etc. I.e. it takes cooperation, and OO's tattoo was perfect signaling she had been willing.
Also, while the nickname wasn't very flattering, OO was given one. Another example of OO's probable happiness, was one particular opportunity to escape that came about and OO did nothing. Mifflin did a great job dissecting the various facts around this event in which OO didn't show herself. This approach taken by Mifflin is one I really enjoyed, scrubbing facts against rumors.
Another of my favorite things in the story was the carefully extracted facts from articles, diaries, letters, even some of OO's own writings. Then, Mifflin would expertly weigh in, and reason whether various accounts or statements were true by using Yavapais (the tribe that murdered her family) and Mohave customs to determine what might have been true or embellished.
Bottom line, the most factual account of what probably occurred in 1851 and the following years, and a truly fascinating read.
The main point behind this particular book (because there have been many about the Oatman massacre) was to try and dispel the sensationalistic story that surrounded this (poor) woman once she was returned back to the "whites" from the Mohaves. When she left, her "adoptive mother" Topeka, cried. There is speculation, that similar to Cynthia Parker, Olive Oatman (OO) didn't want to come back to white society. There is good evidence that OO had assimilated, and was, to the best of her ability in her circumstances, happy. One way Mifflin suggests this possibility is the tattoo on OO's chin. This is done for members of the tribe (Mohave) and for no other reason. When getting the tattoo, one has to not move the mouth so as to not smudge or mar the markings for a certain period and one has to lie very still, etc. I.e. it takes cooperation, and OO's tattoo was perfect signaling she had been willing.
Also, while the nickname wasn't very flattering, OO was given one. Another example of OO's probable happiness, was one particular opportunity to escape that came about and OO did nothing. Mifflin did a great job dissecting the various facts around this event in which OO didn't show herself. This approach taken by Mifflin is one I really enjoyed, scrubbing facts against rumors.
Another of my favorite things in the story was the carefully extracted facts from articles, diaries, letters, even some of OO's own writings. Then, Mifflin would expertly weigh in, and reason whether various accounts or statements were true by using Yavapais (the tribe that murdered her family) and Mohave customs to determine what might have been true or embellished.
Bottom line, the most factual account of what probably occurred in 1851 and the following years, and a truly fascinating read.