Take a photo of a barcode or cover
A review by joe_olipo
Woodcutters by Thomas Bernhard
2.0
Elkin's synopsis is correct: "The 'late style' is an unraveled 'middle style'," though he is mistaken to count as flaw that the narrator, though he is narrowly Bernhard himself, does not engage in discussion with others at the so-called Artistic Dinner as Person of Interest.
The Bernhardian narrator is literally Invisible i.e. DOES NOT REFLECT. This is essential, and clearest in his works which double back to reflect upon the original speaker e.g. Correction in which the pulmonary invalid disappears entirely.
This is a love story, but also possibly Bernhard's least successful work.
The Bernhardian narrator is literally Invisible i.e. DOES NOT REFLECT. This is essential, and clearest in his works which double back to reflect upon the original speaker e.g. Correction in which the pulmonary invalid disappears entirely.
This is a love story, but also possibly Bernhard's least successful work.