Take a photo of a barcode or cover
llanirev 's review for:
Interesting book, full of data about the differences between races. But it really doesn't give an answer to its title 'How to argue with a racist' other than 'read them this book. If they don't fall asleep before the end, it might convince them... maybe somehow'. It really states fact after fact after fact about why people are different and in which ways they aren't. And I kept wondering the whole book how all those datapoints are usable in a discussion. They hardly are. So do I judge this book by its title, because that is why I started reading it? Or do I judge it by the amount of data it provides which I didn't know yet, i.e. do I give it 2 or 3 to 4 stars? I chose the first, because I feel annoyed that I still don't have an answer to the book's title and after reading it, I now have even more questions.