Take a photo of a barcode or cover
chrisrohlev1234 's review for:
The Power and the Glory
by Graham Greene
Easily in my top five. This is my first novel from Graham Greene and to say I enjoyed it would be an understatement. Interestingly enough this is my second book in a row that deals with priesthood and religion, specifically Catholicism. I will say to start off that this book is masterfully crafted and like the back cover states, this is a perfect mix between Dostoevsky and McCarthy. A unnamed priest escaping the authorities and dealing with the moral questions of god, morality, sin and redemption is a novel that is primed for success. Where Greene gains his true mastery is the pitting of characters against each other. First is the unnamed Priest also known as the "Whiskey Priest." A dostoevskian character who while being the epitome of morality is also deeply flawed. Lacking courage, he is aware of his flaws and the fact that he cannot truly uphold the image of god. The lieutenant is his opposite. A man that is ruled my discipline and law. A strict atheist who is against not only religion but organization in general.
"They deserved nothing less than the truth- a vacant universe and a cooling world, the right to be happy in any way they chose. He was quite prepared to make a massacre for their sakes-first the Church and then the foreigner and then the politician-even his own chief would one day have to go. He wanted to begin the world again, with them in a desert."
Lastly you have a character known only as Mestizo. Mestizo is everything sinful encapsulated in a human. He is greedy, deceitful and without remorse. Therefore, he wastes no time in betraying his faith for money. Someone who is solely materialistic.
So you have the three echelons of humans. You have the Lieutenant who like all military men, is ruled by authority. He is not a product of his own free-will. Every decision he makes is that of the law. Without ruining the end, he lives by this mantra even when his conscience disagrees. Then you have the priest. The priest is a man who at his core is good. He commits sin almost continually but he never loses his faith. What makes him good is his self-awareness. He understands the evils of humanity. He is remorseful for his sin and always strives to be better. And lastly you have the Mestizo who is the lowest form of human. Someone who will compromise himself only for money and happiness. He, like the priest, lives in sin but is not aware. He does not see a problem with the way he is living.
So what is the moral of the story?
It is a nuanced approach to Christianity. Man is not perfect and never will be. He will succumb to his needs for sex, entertainment and happiness. So to ask man to abstain from these activities is a very non-human approach to humanity. I personally have believed that this is true for a while as well. I think even those who claim to have "mastered" these temptations are merely lying to themselves. Man is unable to control his need for lust, his overwhelming need for happiness and fulfillment. So the moral of the story is as follows. You don't need to be a perfect person to be courageous. You don't need to spend every waking day and night abstaining from your temptations to be a pious person. Modern Christianity should reflect this attitude. Overall, a great book and one I will reread in the future.
"Shivering and sweating and soaked with rain he came up over the edge of the plateau. There was nobody there- a dead child was not someone, just a useless object abandoned at the foot of one of the crosses. The mother had gone home. She had done what she wanted to do. The surprise lifted him, as it were, out of his fever before it dropped back down again. A small lump of sugar-all that was left- lay by the child's mouth- in case a miracle should happen or for the spirit to eat? The priest bent down with an obscure sense of shame and took it: the dead child couldn't growl back at him like a broken dog: but who was he to disbelieve miracles? He hesitated, while the rain poured down; then he put the sugar in his mouth. If God chose to give back life, couldn't he give food as well?"
"They deserved nothing less than the truth- a vacant universe and a cooling world, the right to be happy in any way they chose. He was quite prepared to make a massacre for their sakes-first the Church and then the foreigner and then the politician-even his own chief would one day have to go. He wanted to begin the world again, with them in a desert."
Lastly you have a character known only as Mestizo. Mestizo is everything sinful encapsulated in a human. He is greedy, deceitful and without remorse. Therefore, he wastes no time in betraying his faith for money. Someone who is solely materialistic.
So you have the three echelons of humans. You have the Lieutenant who like all military men, is ruled by authority. He is not a product of his own free-will. Every decision he makes is that of the law. Without ruining the end, he lives by this mantra even when his conscience disagrees. Then you have the priest. The priest is a man who at his core is good. He commits sin almost continually but he never loses his faith. What makes him good is his self-awareness. He understands the evils of humanity. He is remorseful for his sin and always strives to be better. And lastly you have the Mestizo who is the lowest form of human. Someone who will compromise himself only for money and happiness. He, like the priest, lives in sin but is not aware. He does not see a problem with the way he is living.
So what is the moral of the story?
It is a nuanced approach to Christianity. Man is not perfect and never will be. He will succumb to his needs for sex, entertainment and happiness. So to ask man to abstain from these activities is a very non-human approach to humanity. I personally have believed that this is true for a while as well. I think even those who claim to have "mastered" these temptations are merely lying to themselves. Man is unable to control his need for lust, his overwhelming need for happiness and fulfillment. So the moral of the story is as follows. You don't need to be a perfect person to be courageous. You don't need to spend every waking day and night abstaining from your temptations to be a pious person. Modern Christianity should reflect this attitude. Overall, a great book and one I will reread in the future.
"Shivering and sweating and soaked with rain he came up over the edge of the plateau. There was nobody there- a dead child was not someone, just a useless object abandoned at the foot of one of the crosses. The mother had gone home. She had done what she wanted to do. The surprise lifted him, as it were, out of his fever before it dropped back down again. A small lump of sugar-all that was left- lay by the child's mouth- in case a miracle should happen or for the spirit to eat? The priest bent down with an obscure sense of shame and took it: the dead child couldn't growl back at him like a broken dog: but who was he to disbelieve miracles? He hesitated, while the rain poured down; then he put the sugar in his mouth. If God chose to give back life, couldn't he give food as well?"