Scan barcode
A review by vigil
A Dowry of Blood by S.T. Gibson
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
this book had so many layers to it, especially in regards to the abusive relationship with constanta, magadalena, alexei, and dracula. constanta and dracula's relationship was easily the most interesting, followed by magadalena, and constanta. alexei was sweet (more innocent i suppose), but mostly window dressing to me.
i think a stand out moment of this book was the call back to the very beginning when dracula answers constanta's question of where the servants were with "fled or dead," the same phrase he uses when describing his past lovers, and inadvertently drawing a line between them, and the role of a servant, something he forces the three of them into during the years of their relationship. that contextualized a lot for me, and really hammered home for me (and eventually constanta) how much he needed to go. it's very fitting that she was the one who killed him. it would have been very unsatisfying to me if it were anyone else.
the prose was more dead on than it wasn't for me, though it had its fair share of questionable lines, especially in terms of dialogue which had a tendency to sound more modern than it should. i think the author gave as much information as necessary to the book they wanted to write, and that was largely enough for me, though i think it dampened alexei's introduction which felt, and stayed abrupt throughout the rest of the book. some of it was due to his naturally extroverted nature in what is, in my opinion, a very introverted book, but a large portion of it was due to his lack of intrigue or development. contrastly, i think s.t. gibson did great with magdalena.
i like the inclusion of the sex scenes, and wouldn't have minded more.
i think a stand out moment of this book was the call back to the very beginning when
the prose was more dead on than it wasn't for me, though it had its fair share of questionable lines, especially in terms of dialogue which had a tendency to sound more modern than it should. i think the author gave as much information as necessary to the book they wanted to write, and that was largely enough for me, though i think it dampened alexei's introduction which felt, and stayed abrupt throughout the rest of the book. some of it was due to his naturally extroverted nature in what is, in my opinion, a very introverted book, but a large portion of it was due to his lack of intrigue or development. contrastly, i think s.t. gibson did great with magdalena.
i like the inclusion of the sex scenes, and wouldn't have minded more.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Gore, Grief, Injury/Injury detail, Murder, Emotional abuse, Toxic relationship, Violence, Infidelity, Misogyny, Blood, Body horror, and Physical abuse