2.0

The premise is absolutely on point. I didn't think anything presented in this book was wrong. But, good lord Mr. Pollan, this was DRY. I found it very hard to concentrate on the dry details and, for a book that is downplaying the science of nutritionism, you sure talked a LOT about the science of nutritionism. I don't disagree with the thesis, but the book itself was just too long and too dry.