1.0

Meh. I'm currently interested in King Tut and was looking for more information in him. Patterson says he did a lot of research for this book, which he presents as non-fiction, but I felt more like he just consulted Wikipedia. No footnotes, no citations, no references, so as far as I am concerned, this is historical fiction.

Also super light on the actual details, particularly how he came to conclude that Tut was murdered, when the archaeology community seems to agree that the issue with the mummy's skull was a postmortem artifact.

Disappointed.