Scan barcode
A review by shanaqui
The Mountain in the Sea by Ray Nayler
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Lately, I've had a lot of trouble getting immersed in books like I (think I) used to. I'll read 50 pages and feel like it's been forever; read 10 pages and get distracted by wondering if that email I'm waiting for has come in; a 500 page book is just daunting because it seems like it'll take forever. And I know, I know, it's all the fragmentation caused by mobile phones, etc, etc -- but while I was reading Ray Nayler's The Mountain in the Sea, I wasn't paying any mind to that. My brain was quiet and I was totally focused on the story; I say this by way of introduction because I think it bears saying when a book cuts across that fidgeting and demands attention.
There are essentially three threads to the story, which twine together but never quite meet: there's Ha Nguyen, a scientist, who is brought to a remote island owned by a company called DIANIMA in order to study octopus behaviour that appears potentially much more intelligent than baseline; there's Rustem, a hacker with a unique way of thinking, who is given a fascinating task to hack into an extremely complex artificial intelligence in order to use it as a weapon; and there's Eiko, a captive aboard an AI-controlled fishing ship, forced to clean and sort the catch with no sign of escape.
Of the three stories, Dr Ha's is the most fascinating, and I admit it could be a little annoying to switch to Eiko or Rustem. Ultimately, I'm not sure their stories were entirely necessary: I admire the overall effect, the details that the other two stories lent to Dr Ha's, and the satisfying click as things came together, but Eiko's story didn't lend a lot to it (and his mind palace is overdescribed for something so ultimately useless to the plot -- though I think in terms of themes, it does add to the overall inquiry into how thought works).
Despite how much I liked the reading experience, I think there are still things the book could've dug into deeper. Evrim's cognition is important to this question of intelligence, and yet it's rather brushed under the rug by Ha, who readily declares them to be human all of a sudden, based on the fact that they can interact with humans on human terms. I'm not sure I agree with that definition, or the simplification of it all. There were tantalising bits of inquiry here about artificial intelligence as well as alien (octopus) intelligence, but it feels like it didn't quite go deep enough; perhaps Eiko's thread should've been reduced in order to give more space for that.
The same goes for the octopus cognition, really: sometimes Ha comes to conclusions rapidly based on fairly little evidence. Is something built of human skulls necessarily an altar? Does it necessarily mean that they're worshipping humans or trying to appease them? Are you sure it's not a war trophy?
That makes the book sound unsatisfying, and I don't think it is: personally, I found it fascinating and riveting. There's just so much space to expand, as well.
There are essentially three threads to the story, which twine together but never quite meet: there's Ha Nguyen, a scientist, who is brought to a remote island owned by a company called DIANIMA in order to study octopus behaviour that appears potentially much more intelligent than baseline; there's Rustem, a hacker with a unique way of thinking, who is given a fascinating task to hack into an extremely complex artificial intelligence in order to use it as a weapon; and there's Eiko, a captive aboard an AI-controlled fishing ship, forced to clean and sort the catch with no sign of escape.
Of the three stories, Dr Ha's is the most fascinating, and I admit it could be a little annoying to switch to Eiko or Rustem. Ultimately, I'm not sure their stories were entirely necessary: I admire the overall effect, the details that the other two stories lent to Dr Ha's, and the satisfying click as things came together, but Eiko's story didn't lend a lot to it (and his mind palace is overdescribed for something so ultimately useless to the plot -- though I think in terms of themes, it does add to the overall inquiry into how thought works).
Despite how much I liked the reading experience, I think there are still things the book could've dug into deeper. Evrim's cognition is important to this question of intelligence, and yet it's rather brushed under the rug by Ha, who readily declares them to be human all of a sudden, based on the fact that they can interact with humans on human terms. I'm not sure I agree with that definition, or the simplification of it all. There were tantalising bits of inquiry here about artificial intelligence as well as alien (octopus) intelligence, but it feels like it didn't quite go deep enough; perhaps Eiko's thread should've been reduced in order to give more space for that.
The same goes for the octopus cognition, really: sometimes Ha comes to conclusions rapidly based on fairly little evidence. Is something built of human skulls necessarily an altar? Does it necessarily mean that they're worshipping humans or trying to appease them? Are you sure it's not a war trophy?
That makes the book sound unsatisfying, and I don't think it is: personally, I found it fascinating and riveting. There's just so much space to expand, as well.