Scan barcode
A review by mikarala
Dracula by Bram Stoker
adventurous
dark
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5
The opening chapters told from the POV of Jonathan Harker via his journal as he becomes a guest at Dracula's castle would make an excellent short story. After that section, I thought this was going to be a 4.5-5 star book.
Unfortunately, that was by far the most gripping point of the novel.
From that point on, the story went downhill. The middle was terribly long and dull, and the climax wasn't much better. Nominally, there were horrifying events happening that increased the tension in the story, however, I just didn't care or find it interesting. Count Dracula as a character was, frankly, disappointing. For all of the mysterious and disturbing sense of menace he brought in the early chapters, he didn't really have much presence in the rest of the novel--certainly he wasn't accompanied by that same feeling of doom. I really didn't care for any of the rest of our cast of vampire hunters. It seems like it should be exciting, but it just really wasn't.
What I did find a bit interesting was viewing this novel as a great time capsule, with Stoker's obsessive inclusion of various new technological inventions and newfangled societal trends. Unfortunately, this has downsides. Dracula is an epistolary novel, and while I liked the idea of Dr. Seward using his phonograph to record his diary, and enjoyed the inclusion of certain important events being alluded to in newpaper article format, for the most part I found this style kind of cumbersome. Frankly there were moments where it became awkward and broke my suspension of disbelief (ahem when Mina literally "stutters" in her writing lmao).
Also there was just a lot of benevolent sexism and casual racism. One of Mina's jobs is literally to be cheerful so the menfolk can rally around her as a source to motivation. Not even an exaggeration; that's actually from the text. And the casual racism is toward the "gipsies", who uncritically serve Dracula due to superstition or something? I don't know, because it's not interrogated at all, but presumably they just don't know any better because they aren't proper white Anglo-Saxons, right, Stoker? It's honestly not even a huge part of the text, but it did really bother me.
Ultimately, while it's fascinating to read a classic that codified so many vampire-related tropes that continue into the modern day, I don't think the novel itself is that impressive.
Unfortunately, that was by far the most gripping point of the novel.
From that point on, the story went downhill. The middle was terribly long and dull, and the climax wasn't much better. Nominally, there were horrifying events happening that increased the tension in the story, however, I just didn't care or find it interesting. Count Dracula as a character was, frankly, disappointing. For all of the mysterious and disturbing sense of menace he brought in the early chapters, he didn't really have much presence in the rest of the novel--certainly he wasn't accompanied by that same feeling of doom. I really didn't care for any of the rest of our cast of vampire hunters. It seems like it should be exciting, but it just really wasn't.
What I did find a bit interesting was viewing this novel as a great time capsule, with Stoker's obsessive inclusion of various new technological inventions and newfangled societal trends. Unfortunately, this has downsides. Dracula is an epistolary novel, and while I liked the idea of Dr. Seward using his phonograph to record his diary, and enjoyed the inclusion of certain important events being alluded to in newpaper article format, for the most part I found this style kind of cumbersome. Frankly there were moments where it became awkward and broke my suspension of disbelief (ahem when Mina literally "stutters" in her writing lmao).
Also there was just a lot of benevolent sexism and casual racism. One of Mina's jobs is literally to be cheerful so the menfolk can rally around her as a source to motivation. Not even an exaggeration; that's actually from the text. And the casual racism is toward the "gipsies", who uncritically serve Dracula due to superstition or something? I don't know, because it's not interrogated at all, but presumably they just don't know any better because they aren't proper white Anglo-Saxons, right, Stoker? It's honestly not even a huge part of the text, but it did really bother me.
Ultimately, while it's fascinating to read a classic that codified so many vampire-related tropes that continue into the modern day, I don't think the novel itself is that impressive.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Gore and Sexism
Minor: Racism