Scan barcode
bashsbooks's reviews
244 reviews
5.0
Graphic: Death, Domestic abuse, Hate crime, Misogyny, Toxic relationship, Violence, Grief, Stalking, and Murder
Moderate: Rape, Sexual violence, and Abortion
Minor: Cursing, Fatphobia, Infidelity, Excrement, and Toxic friendship
5.0
As usual, a list of my favorite poems from the collection: Puławy, Lucky Jew, WWII German SS Division Soup Spoon "800 Silver" $250, Hitler Youth Dagger RZM M7/13 $550 FIRM, A Brass Band Heralds the Institute's Destruction, and To a Jazz Singer.
Graphic: Genocide, Racism, Violence, Xenophobia, Antisemitism, and Grief
Moderate: Death, Homophobia, Misogyny, Transphobia, and War
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
When I was about halfway through Agnes Grey, I commented to my partner that I felt bad for Anne Brontë that Agnes Grey was originally published as the third of a three-volume set, with the first two volumes being her sister's Wuthering Heights. I read the two back-to-back in that same order, and I think I would've thought Agnes Grey better without the comparison.
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Misogyny, and Classism
Moderate: Alcoholism, Bullying, Death of parent, and Toxic friendship
Minor: Chronic illness, Cursing, and Toxic relationship
4.75
Onto the review of this specific book: Playing the Whore is only ten chapters long, and each chapter focuses on a different angle through which sex work is perceived, policed, and (mis)understood. That is a lot of information to cover in such a short book, and so I would say my biggest "critique" (if it could be even called that) is that I wanted to know more. I will be looking Grant up and reading more of her writing later to rectify this. Otherwise, I think this is a really good introduction to sex work as a political movement and also as a job, with the same complexities, boring realities, annoying customers, etc. as any other job. It also does a really good job in laying out the intersections between sex work movements and labor, health, gender, and queer movements.
I felt like it was really accessible for someone who is pretty ignorant of the specifics on sex work but is familiar with other sociopolitical movements (read: me) - I remember telling someone while reading it that it really held my hand without coddling me, which is something I always appreciate from this kind of introduction.
Graphic: Hate crime and Police brutality
Moderate: Misogyny, Racism, Rape, Sexual violence, Transphobia, Violence, Xenophobia, Murder, and Classism
Minor: Child abuse, Drug use, and Trafficking
5.0
It's also incredibly inclusive and understanding of how vital binding is - all the recommended medical advice comes with the important caveat that it's okay if you can't stop binding. It's a truly thoughtful application of harm-reduction principles - and it has a whole section to help the read convey this vitality to healthcare providers. The inclusivity extends to the list of conditions that may alter the binding experience, and it's present in the variety of people who demonstrate the exercises in the last portion of the book. And speaking of the exercises, WOW! Reed is a massage therapist with years of experience helping people who bind, and this treasure-trove of suggested exercises shows it.
It's also laid out in an extremely clear and logical manner, complete with two indexes (one for the exercises, listed by symptom, and one general) so that it doesn't need to be read cover-to-cover.
Rarely do I finish a book and think that I need my own copy, but this is one I want on-hand for my reference, first to guide me through picking out a new binder, and then to maintain my physical health while wearing it.
Moderate: Chronic illness and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Transphobia and Dysphoria
Did not finish book. Stopped at 24%.
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
So let me say some basic and trite (but none the less true to how I feel) things about Wuthering Heights.
First and foremost, Brontë's toxic, passionate speeches from Heathcliff and Catherine (Sr.) about each other fuck severely. Catherine's "Nelly, I am Heathcliff" confession? Healthcliff's proclamation about the depth of Catherine's affection for him compared to Linton? The "You say I killed you - haunt me, then!" argument? All bangers. Go off, you absolute maniacs.
Secondly, and speaking of the haunting by Catherine of Heathcliff, the thread of her ghost trying to get into Wuthering Heights throughout the tale is sewn into the story with just enough detail to be compelling without being overwrought - from the early scene Lockhood witnesses all the way to Heathcliff's death under the open window. I especially like the lack of concrete proof of the ghost and the skepticism of the storytellers themselves.
And now, thirdly, the storytellers and the frame story in general have been fun to turn over in my head. From the beginning, I wondered, why are Lockwood and Nelly our narrators? I think there are dozens of valid answers to this question. Two of my favorites includeto create distance from the narrative to drop details & increase unreliability and to provide perspectives closer to the intended readers. I'm especially obsessed with Nelly Dean and the constant interjections of her opinions into her retelling.
Something specific to the audiobook version that I listened to - the Spotify version read by Billie Fulford-Brown - is that it was read fantastically. Fulford-Brown clearly had a great handle on the text, reading all the dialogue with accurate emotion. She also gave the characters distinct voices without being over-the-top. Her performance made Brontë's mid-19th century prose much more accessible.
Anyway. There's a lot more I could say about Wuthering Heights - for example, Brontë's descriptions of the moors are a masterclass in thematic use of setting - but I'll cut myself off here, lest I write a whole paper. Let me end by saying it's fucked up that Kate Bush managed to successfully summarize and convey the main storyline of such a complex book in a 4.5-minute song after only watching the last ten minutes of a movie adaptation.
Graphic: Death, Domestic abuse, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Toxic relationship, Violence, Grief, Death of parent, Alcohol, and Classism
Moderate: Ableism, Alcoholism, Cursing, Racism, Terminal illness, Xenophobia, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Confinement, Racial slurs, and Kidnapping
2.75
Petersen's best writing in A Comprehensive Guide To Intersex were his personal experiences, which give the reader a sense that he is an authority on the subject and reveal how abstract ideas of discrimination are put into play, and the aspects of the text that were purely medically informative or resource driven - like the second chapter, which details all known intersex variations.
Unfortunately, beyond these two aspects, Petersen's book is bad in a myriad of way - both objectively to the general reader and subjectively to my personal understanding of sex and gender. I'll start with the objective: this book is in DESPERATE need of an editor. I usually don't like to be nitpicky about things like punctation and grammar, but this text is so medically dense that the misapplication these two things made it difficult to read sometimes. Subjectively, Petersen seems overly committed to pre-birth causes of intersex identity, fetus and embryos, and God - I fail to see, for example, why it matters if something happens after birth to make someone physically between sexes (like an accident or contaminate or some similiar event). Also, to the commitment that intersex and transgender are always and wholly distinct - as someone who is both, I find that bizarre.
Graphic: Ableism, Sexism, Medical content, and Medical trauma
Moderate: Body shaming, Bullying, and Child abuse
Minor: Abortion
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
I thought Gene and Luis - and many of the supporting characters as well - were good people with realistic nuances, hangups, and moments of frustration. I was interested in the baseball aspect purely through Hoffman's obvious affection and passion for the sport. And I was very pleasantly surprised to see explicit gay trans sex, which I am not used to finding in published work outside of very specific erotica, so that was a treat.
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Panic attacks/disorders and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Alcoholism, Homophobia, Misogyny, Racism, Sexism, Transphobia, Death of parent, and Classism
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
That said, the conflict was weak at some points and strange at others. And the ending definitely felt quite rushed - Aurora dealt with her shit FAST.
Graphic: Sexual content and Death of parent
Moderate: Toxic relationship, Violence, and Grief
Minor: Alcohol and War