Scan barcode
billyjepma's reviews
623 reviews
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.25
There are hints of promise, specifically in the strength of female friendship and solidarity, but Hendrix's writing is so rooted in a shallow faux-feminism that it sabotages the book at every turn. For one thing, he can't help but describe women's bodies in detail, even when the context would make such specificity frivolous at best. It's a symptom of a larger problem, though, and only gets worse as the story approaches the climax, where Hendrix resorts to the threat of sexual violence or the act itself to ramp up the tension in ways I found to be distasteful. The book wants to paint a picture of how men have historically abused women, treating them like objects or tools for their pleasure or pursuit of power. I'm all for that, especially in a "vampire" period piece like this. But when that book also has a habit of treating its women the same way as the men it condemns, any semblance of commentary quickly deteriorates.
It doesn't help that the characters are predominantly defined by their genders and the traits stereotypically associated with them. Those aren't bad traits for a character to have, mind you, but I struggle to believe that women in the era were exclusively defined by their roles as wives and mothers. The insistence on defining all these characters by different shades of those characteristics was disappointing, especially since Hendrix failed to give the women any interior lives or depth beyond the basest impulses projected onto them. At the very least, though, he knows his way around the genre, and his fast-paced, zippy writing makes this an easy page-turner. He also has a knack for setting up nail-biting scenarios that gross you out just as much as they keep you flipping pages. Granted, some of those scenarios end up falling into the same problems I had with the rest of the book, but the build-up was there, at least. If Hendrix had more self-awareness about his limits and strengths, this could've been a pulpy banger of a book, but alas.
None of these problems are unique to this book, though—I recognize many of his worst impulses from some of Stephen King's earlier works, alongside plenty of other male horror writers. But we (meaning white men like myself) can do better than this, and it's frustrating when I find books that seem to tell me otherwise.
Graphic: Adult/minor relationship, Child death, Gore, Rape, Sexual assault, Suicide, Violence, Blood, Gaslighting, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Addiction, Animal death, Infidelity, Pedophilia, Racism, Sexism, Toxic relationship, and Suicide attempt
Minor: Domestic abuse and Drug abuse
4.5
4.5
“Wilderness is not distant. We are continually immersed in it. It is there for us to imagine, to savor, and to protect.”
Like many, I wanted to be a zoologist or paleontologist as a kid. While that drive went away (somewhat) when I later realized I might not be wired for those careers, that love and curiosity for the natural world (past and present) never left. And after reading Yong’s book, I’ve started to wonder if maybe I should try rewiring my brain so it can live in the world of science, discovery, and mystery that he writes about in this book because I didn’t want to leave it.
This is a dense book, with lots of vocabulary words and heady scientific concepts and theories—some I recognized from my school days, many were new to me—that I usually had to limit myself to a chapter at a time or else run the risk of not fully absorbing the material. But don’t get me wrong; Yong’s writing is very readable, even lovely, at times. My occasional forays into books of this ilk usually satisfy whatever curiosity brought me to them but don’t often satisfy the reader who values compelling writing. Yong’s book did both. This being a broader exploration of fields of study and creatures certainly helps with the approachability, but I never felt shorted by any of the sections. Yong eases you into the science, provides plenty of notes and asides for additional context, and leaves you with enough takeaways to feel like you’ve learned something important while also knowing how much more there is to know. And, most importantly, he’s just a good writer with something to share and say. I’ll be recommending this book to anyone who will listen for the foreseeable future.
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
2.75
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
There is some solid commentary around Inez's class affording her certain privileges, and I appreciate how Ibañez leans into the sexist rules society was forced to abide by at the time. Ultimately, the book's historical accuracy (or inaccuracy, when appropriate) is one of its greatest assets. In its best moments, the book is almost immersive because it thoroughly places you in the setting, encouraging you to see the world as Inez does—big, mysterious, and full of promise. And once the book finds its momentum in the final stretch, it really starts coming alive. The archeological-adventure elements finally show themselves, and perhaps most importantly, the romance begins to generate some genuine heat. Both characters still come off as thinly sketched fantasies, but they find enough of a spark that I want to see where their dynamic goes next, especially if it revels in the pulpy melodrama of it more, which the tease at the end seems to suggest it will.
It's too bad that this nearly 400-page book amounts to 2/3s of a story, but credit where credit is due: I'm absolutely picking up the sequel later this year. There's quite a bit of charm here, and with the more genre-heavy elements seemingly primed to take more of the spotlight in the next chapter, I'm excited to see where it could go. I hope Ibañez leans into the fantasy angle because it's one of the most interesting ideas she plays with here, and I want to see more of it.
Moderate: Violence, Death of parent, Abandonment, Colonisation, and Classism
Minor: Blood, Murder, Alcohol, and War
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Moderate: Death, Grief, Toxic friendship, and Colonisation
Minor: Fire/Fire injury
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
The artists make the otherwise quick but dense story feel like a proper event, too. Any weight I felt was missing from the plot was more than remedied with the scale of the art, which is no minor thing, considering there are multiple artists involved. The transition between styles is mostly seamless, though, with the different approaches helping accentuate the different dramatic beats. Like the rest of the book, the execution isn’t perfect, but it’s well above what it could’ve been and carried more than enough dramatic heft to outclass most of the other superhero books on shelves.
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
"This city begs to burn."
I knew from the opening chapter that this would be one of the best books I'd read this year, and every page after only reinforced that first impression. Harper's writing is lean and mean, always striking the perfect balance of propulsive tension and patient intrigue. It keeps the suspense at a steady tempo that ensures we're always on the edge of a dreadful twist of the knife, which makes for a helluva reading experience. If it weren't as dire and nihilistic a story as it is, I would've torn through it in a weekend. I'm glad I forced myself to take my time with it, though, because reading a couple of chapters a night made it feel like I was tuning into a prestige HBO drama.
Despite the very modern and snappy writing, I felt like Harper's storytelling evoked a similar sensibility to the late and great Cormac McCarthy, as both writers display an innate understanding of the rotted soul of the country and a willingness to wade into its depths. There are layers upon layers of corruption and grimy morality at play in these pages, but it never feels like Harper is on a soapbox. His book is sharper than that and far too interested in the interiors of its characters to let anyone—his readers included—off the hook with an easy-to-digest takeaway. Instead, I finished it with a pit in my stomach and something resembling either rage or resignation simmering in my head. And that's the point; nothing here will surprise people who pay attention to the world around them. But the insights it provides are needle-sharp, forcing us to look into the ugliest parts of that world, see how an army of interconnected systems keeps its blackened heart pumping, and then force us to sit with the realization that we will likely never defeat it. It's not a hopeless book—Harper is very good at keeping his characters and, by tension, his audience aware of their culpability and/or responsibility—but it is a deeply pessimistic one.
Anyway, I adored this book and will spend the rest of the year stewing on it. It's a harsh read but a crucial one, I'd argue, if not for its scathing honesty about the state of our culture, then for the reminder that the role we play in it is still important, regardless of how insignificant it feels.
Graphic: Adult/minor relationship, Violence, Police brutality, and Fire/Fire injury
Moderate: Death, Drug use, Gun violence, Hate crime, Pedophilia, Rape, Sexual assault, Suicide, Torture, Blood, Trafficking, and Pregnancy
Minor: Addiction
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
The story is so big, so mythic, and deals with lofty topics around religion, war, environmentalism, fanaticism, and many more. As dizzying as it can feel, Miyazaki's integration of theme into the story feels wholly organic. You can see his vision pulsing as he gets further into the saga he's telling, and the orchestrated chaos he wields in the enormous war sequences is second to none. I love how his artwork is so fluid, too, constantly evolving to match the scale of the scene he's drawing. His action is fast, frantic, and shocking in its bloodshed—seriously, the violence is brutal in ways I was not expecting—but he balances it out with meditative moments of reflection that allow his characters to wrestle with their role(s) in the world around them. Some of the busier panels are hard to decipher, yet even those seem intentional in how they blur the line between the figures on the page and the ensuing effects of their violence—smoke, blood, and bodies pressed so close together you can't tell where one starts and the other ends.
And, of course, there are gorgeous images aplenty, especially with all the aerial combat and flight that Miyazaki is so fond of. I lost track of how often I called my spouse over to show her a panel of an airship disappearing into the cloud or the wind effects flying off of Nausicaä's glider as she whirls through the open air. This is my first real experience with manga, which seems like the equivalent of having Lawrence of Arabia be the first movie you ever watch. It is a true stunner that I feel very lucky to have another 500+ pages to look forward to.
Graphic: Animal death, Death, and War
Moderate: Violence, Blood, and Colonisation
Minor: Child death