An excellent introduction to the role of grandmothers and other alloparents in successful child rearing in humans. Also with reference to other primates and other animals as comparative models. Could do with a little more genetics support; sections on kin-selection and child–mother competition are too sketchy.
This is a problematic work that makes for a problematic review.
It is messy with some good parts mixed in with less good. If you like Tufte, you'll find enough good parts. If you don't, or you haven't read any Tufte before, you should probably skip it.
The book is designed on the spread. By which i mean each opening (2 pages, side by side) is designed as a whole unit. A topic is introduced, discussed, expanded upon, and brought to some sort of conclusion within the 2 pages. There are a few sections where a block of text continues from one page and carries on overleaf, but not very many.
The effect is like reading a series of short essays, sometimes thematically linked, sometimes narratively linked, but quite often not so much. Occasionally i think the topic is just getting interesting, and turn to page to discover of course something completely different.
Some parts of the book cohere more than others.
The design is part of a philosophy of book publishing that Tufte outlines early on in this same book: namely that authors should have control over layout. I have read his first book, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, so i see the positives on this point. But when is comes to making books, as opposed to the business of writing words, not all authors are capable of good design. And i have to say it, even good designers can have bad days making books (this one, or at least parts of it).
Parts of the book are good. Well designed, coherent, thrusting an effective argument and narrative forwards. But other parts are incoherent, or contradictory. It's not enough to dismiss the book entirely, but neither does the whole form a compelling work.
Reading it can be quite frustrating. Mostly because i think there is some good advice, and certainly some advice worth considering context. But it's not a good look to argue for more author control over publishing, and then have typos and paragraph layout mistakes. He writes about central axis typography (a pragraph with the lines centered, like some poetry), lists, and direct annotation; but then often fails to use them later in the book where i think they would help.
A charming little blue book. It's nice to see that it is bound in signatures and printed with a fluorescent pink spot colour (very similar to Sofie Beier's Type Tricks). The contents page is hilarious, being mostly a list of punctuation marks. Each glyph has a 2-page spread (or occasionally 4-page) and has a little blurb accompanying it. And i must say while i find that interesting and fun, it does occasionally make me wonder if all the facts are true facts; for example "The original shape of an asterisk was seven armed".