Scan barcode
gwcoffey's reviews
520 reviews
Orfeo by Richard Powers
informative
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Orfeo is plagued by some of the same linguistic pretense that is found in The Gold Bug Variations (pretense that thrilled me in my 20s but I now find a bit grating). But it does not have the same dramatic power of that earlier book, and so it fell a little flat for me.
I’m a big fan of Richard Powers and in a sense as he has evolved as a writer, I have evolved as a reader. I suspect I would have enjoyed this more had I read it when it was first written fifteen years ago. But now I find it lacking in things his later novels exemplify. It doesn’t have the scope, awe, and moving beauty of The Overstory or the sparkling emotional perfection of Bewilderment. And for early Powers it lacks the wonder and deeply moving characterizations of Gold Bug. And so I turned the last page thinking I head read smart work by a brilliant writer that I know can and will do so much better.
I’m a big fan of Richard Powers and in a sense as he has evolved as a writer, I have evolved as a reader. I suspect I would have enjoyed this more had I read it when it was first written fifteen years ago. But now I find it lacking in things his later novels exemplify. It doesn’t have the scope, awe, and moving beauty of The Overstory or the sparkling emotional perfection of Bewilderment. And for early Powers it lacks the wonder and deeply moving characterizations of Gold Bug. And so I turned the last page thinking I head read smart work by a brilliant writer that I know can and will do so much better.
A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson
informative
inspiring
fast-paced
5.0
Wow what a delightful book this is. There was almost nothing here I didn't already know, more or less. But it was all presented in such a well integrated and beautiful way that it was a joy to read. I’m a big Bryson fan and this has been on my list a long time. I’m so glad I finally got to it.
Ammonite by Nicola Griffith
adventurous
emotional
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Ammonite starts slow and thoughtful, exploring interesting and surprising ideas about its science fiction universe. And then it builds to an engaging plot-driven story that’s hard to put down.
I almost wish I had read Griffith’s explanation of what she was trying to do first (in my edition this was an afterword) because I think it would have made me more attuned to some really compelling aspects of the book more quickly. But this is not to say it doesn’t succeed. It absolutely does.
I loved the world, the people, and then fictional science here. It was original, fascinating, and really fun to read. And I especially loved the complex and diverse cast of female characters.
I almost wish I had read Griffith’s explanation of what she was trying to do first (in my edition this was an afterword) because I think it would have made me more attuned to some really compelling aspects of the book more quickly. But this is not to say it doesn’t succeed. It absolutely does.
I loved the world, the people, and then fictional science here. It was original, fascinating, and really fun to read. And I especially loved the complex and diverse cast of female characters.
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance by Robert M. Pirsig
3.0
This book started slow and frustrating but redeemed itself by the end. I’m not a philosophy expert by any stretch of the imagination but I found Part 3 engaging and thought provoking.
Part 1 felt, to me, marred by a sort of narcissism that was grating. Both the narrator and the author felt a bit like a “well actually” reply guy except instead of one exhausting tweet, he wrote a whole book.
At one point the narrator describes a time when he felt seen and accepted as his true self, and it was when he stood at the head of a classroom and everyone hung on his every word. This is revealing.
But like I said, although this narcissism never went away, and the narrator remains, to me, deeply unlikable, the philosophy of the later parts drowns it out and it becomes worth reading.
Part 1 felt, to me, marred by a sort of narcissism that was grating. Both the narrator and the author felt a bit like a “well actually” reply guy except instead of one exhausting tweet, he wrote a whole book.
At one point the narrator describes a time when he felt seen and accepted as his true self, and it was when he stood at the head of a classroom and everyone hung on his every word. This is revealing.
But like I said, although this narcissism never went away, and the narrator remains, to me, deeply unlikable, the philosophy of the later parts drowns it out and it becomes worth reading.
Cutting for Stone by Abraham Verghese
3.0
This is a beautifully and confidently written book, which I found refreshing. The author knows exactly what he wants to say and says it briskly and directly. It is full of minutiae that I found engrossing. The overall story is genuinely moving if a little meandering. Verghese takes his time in the mind of each character and they are alive and believable.
But I can’t shake my discomfort at the treatment of the Genet character. She’s the closest thing to a villain here and yet her supposed crimes don’t ring true. So many writers use the autonomy and sexual freedom of young women as a proxy for evil. Here it seems to be the primary motivating evil of the plot. I understand why Marion is hurt but the blame does not rest on Genet. At least not in any significant way. The author seems to forget that Genet is as alive, free, and human as his protagonist. Anyway this bugged me early on and only got worse in the final act.
Still though a powerful touching book.
But I can’t shake my discomfort at the treatment of the Genet character. She’s the closest thing to a villain here and yet her supposed crimes don’t ring true. So many writers use the autonomy and sexual freedom of young women as a proxy for evil. Here it seems to be the primary motivating evil of the plot. I understand why Marion is hurt but the blame does not rest on Genet. At least not in any significant way. The author seems to forget that Genet is as alive, free, and human as his protagonist. Anyway this bugged me early on and only got worse in the final act.
Still though a powerful touching book.