Extremely stilted and repetitive language, which I understand was done on purpose. I wonder if this was an issue of translation. Forced repetitive symbolism to connect the events of part 1 of 1949 to part 2 some 25 years later (dog barking, gasoline, specific plant mention... It was very unnatural and felt very forced). Overall an interesting read but not what I would call a must read. It is short enough to be read through in a day so may as well have a read through as it does cover a true event in part 1. The ending was very predictable, but there was no other way for this story to end.
Disappointed as I had much higher hopes for this. Rounded up to 3 stars for GoodReads.
Nothing to do with the book, my Chinese reading ability is just very slow and this book was causing our book club to move at a snail's pace so we have shelved this one and have moved on.
I really enjoyed SA Cosby's Blacktop Wasteland so was excited to start this book. The premise really turned me off but I tried to keep faith with his writing and pushed through to just over a quarter of the book. I started skim reading at that point and stopped around 50% or so. I may skip to the last chapters just to get some kind of ending and resolution. It just got more and more uncomfortable to me that it was seemingly a homophobic dads redemption through revenge story? It may be premature for me to say this, as I have not gotten to the end but this is what it was feeling like from the start. Maybe my thoughts will change when I read the ending chapters. I also had the twist spoiled for me in a GoodReads review, so this turned me off from the book as well.
Extremely strange, almost feels like self-insert fantasy? Mouthpiece characters who show up, say plot moving points, then get killed. Deus ex machina saves. A lot of telling, lacking the showing. Tells me some character is very intelligent but never shows any of it. The strangest part is having the so-called villain be involved in all these left-wing organizations, which OK fair enough but then to reveal a PLO associate of his who is basically just a cartoon villain? He claims the Israeli Prime Minister is a war criminal, fair enough, then goes on to say "Jews are the new Nazis" without ever speaking to any of the PLO context. Very weird.
I was recommended this book based on looking for a book with Vatican intrigue but this is too over the top for me.