Scan barcode
jstilts's reviews
62 reviews
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
It's absolutely spot-on to where the characters are at that point in their lives and their interpersonal relationships - yes, including the tense love/hate/frenemy triangle between Adora, Catra and Scorpia. Catra and Scorpia especially are given some space to have some moments that ring true and tug at the heartstrings.
Once the first few pages of info-dump are done it's fun, it's funny, it's touching, and while it slots in perfectly with the show the final few pages still manage to give Adora a deft bit of character development that wasn't ever quite addressed in the show so explicitly, but doesn't contradict anything either.
The art style is very close to the cartoon - my only complaints are the lettering is hard to read and the speech balloons sometimes have two people's words but only one pointer. Minor niggles!
Moderate: Toxic relationship and Toxic friendship
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.0
The art style is at first somewhat gristly but otherwise aimed at hormonal teens, then swaps artists to become simply a bit rubbish instead.
Cannot recommend this book at all.
Graphic: Gore, Cancer, Animal cruelty, Body horror, and Violence
Moderate: Gun violence, Fire/Fire injury, Medical trauma, Self harm, Terminal illness, Medical content, and Toxic relationship
Minor: Child abuse
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
James Lovegrove delivers a novel that eschews the steampunk and supernatural conceits that often blight this series, instead promising a tale that puts Watson in the spotlight as the duo investigate a missing persons case. The case leads them to a commune of sorts where Ancient Greek society and mythology is revered, including it's more macabre aspects. It doesn't really put Watson in the spotlight much more than usual - there were plenty of missed opportunities for that, even to the point of sidelining out heroes for a Holmes stand-in for much of the tale where instead Watson could have been written in - but everything on the page was good, so no complaints here.
It's not quite the mystery I was hoping for - the plot is relatively straightforward and solved before the third and final part, leaving the rest of the book as something of a thriller, but one where Holmes uses his brain to ensure their survival.
Lovegrove writes nicely in the expected style, and has created a very engaging page-turner that's generally quite good fun. A little lacking in the criminal deductions department, but this was too enjoyable a read for me to complain.
Graphic: Cultural appropriation
Moderate: Animal death, Death, Murder, Confinement, and Kidnapping
Minor: Suicide attempt, Gun violence, and Injury/Injury detail
1.0
Frankly half the time this reads like a Wikipedia page, and while many of the subjects covered are worthy they are sped over. The book is supposedly narrated by one of the characters, but there is scant opportunity to experience anything from his point of view.
It's no "Charley's War" but I'm sad to say it does seem to borrow very freely from some of it's highlights - but without any of the character or depth that singular series excelled at. Very disappointing.
The art is passable.
Graphic: War
Moderate: Gun violence and Death
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
This Czech play from the 1920s is famous for coining the term "Robot" from the Czech words for serf labour. The titular Robots (human in appeance but much simpler on the inside) are being manufactured with the lofty goal of entirely freeing humans from labour - while making a lot of cash for the manufacturer, and saving lots of cash for the purchasers in unpaid labour. However, as this social revolution is set to take decades, the human workers faced with suffering unemployment through this lengthy change take arms against the robots - and so both Industry and Goverments arm the robots against the humans.
The play covers before, during and after the war - all from the perspective of those running Rossum's Universal Robots, and some of the robots themselves. It's a darkly comical play that critiques Capitalism, Industrialisation, Slavery, and to my surprise Misogyny - although it could be mistaken as only a reflection of the times it was written in depending on how the play is performed (however playwright Karel Čapek' politics point to it as a critique).
The epilogue is fascinatingly dark, and while the last lines became a mid 20th Century sci-fi cliche hoary enough to make my eyes roll, be aware this play was probably the very first to do it - and probably only did so to rescue the play from being utterly bleak, although I imagine people at the time found it so anyway!
Moderate: Body horror, Slavery, Misogyny, Sexism, War, Classism, and Death
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
This tale is about an elderly employee of a book store who has been hand-delivering books around his German town for decades, and absolutely lives for the job. Circumstances put his ongoing employment in doubt, just as he is joined on his rounds by a disruptive but sweet schoolgirl - and it's as much their story as it is about the people they deliver books to.
Moderate: Domestic abuse and Physical abuse
Minor: Death of parent, Alcohol, and Grief
1.0
The plot is an incoherent mess, the art style is variable (even between characters in the same panel), and there's that crushing sense that a very worthy subject has been squandered. It tries to be reverential - ironically while critiquing such reverence - it's almost offensive in it's failure.
Additionally, I can't imagine who this book is aimed at. Perhaps it hopes to encourage those who have never read Anne Frank to do so, but I think they'll be baffled. For those who have read Anne Frank, I think they'll find this much as I did - an unworthy addition full of random nonsense, with a germ of an idea that went nowhere interesting.
Moderate: Hate crime, Kidnapping, Murder, Confinement, Deportation, Classism, Genocide, Antisemitism, Grief, War, Child death, Death, and Racism
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
For fans of the series, this one has some shocks - but by the end you'll realise it's still good wholesome stuff that would be good to put in the hands of someone facing similar emotional experiences. It's almost a fictional handbook in illustrating how not everything is always the way it appears - especially when you are catastrophising!
This isn't a graphic novel like most of the Heartstopper series to date (although there are a few sweet panels), and at first it seems like it doesn't translate well to prose: Nick and Charlie's voice seems off, and Charlie sounds way too mature - until I realise, this is their inner monologue and not the way they present themselves to the outside world. Sure enough, when they talk or text - same old Nick and Charlie. While in no way a criticism of the excellent graphic novels, this book definitely enriches their characters in a way the graphic novels were never going to - and that's more down to the creative decision to have almost every thought in the graphic novel presented in a conversational way.
Moderate: Grief
Minor: Eating disorder
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Set almost entirely in Babel following a single quest, this book greater focus on the rich detailed world building of Babel society allows the overall plot to become fluffier and more mysterious, frankly treading water a little to spoon-feed us the fantasy set-up for the final volume. This isn't criticism as such, it's a very deft bit of furniture moving that's so pleasant an experience I can hardly complain.
It's not however quite as compelling as the second volume, as really you feel Ophelia could just shrug her shoulders and walk away from her troubles for the first three quarters of the book - driven mainly by her desire to reunite with Thorn, which is hard to fathom as while we saw Thorn fall in love with Ophelia in the last book - believable only because I'll accept any insight I to the inscrutable oaf - Ophelia has hardly had reason to do likewise, especially as we're privy to her thought and feelings that she STILL finds hard to quantify (after years!) that her love is a bit hard to believe. I can only put it down to the desperate need to connect during and after disaster, which they experienced together at the end of book two.
Looking forward to the final volume nevertheless - this one was strangely simultaneously better and worse than the previous books, so in a way an interesting diversion on the journey, a side quest and a breather before the finale.
Minor: Ableism, Emotional abuse, Murder, Toxic relationship, Physical abuse, Dementia, Death, and Violence
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
The problem for me is the books in this series are mostly well written to a point about three quarters the way through where they become trite - this turning point being when they fully engage with whatever highly un-Sherlockian conceit the plot has been saddled with: Frankenstein, for instance. "The Devil's Dust" has a similar structure, but it is saved by the conceit being more grounded in Holmes' world than usual: Sherlock and Watson meet, spar and sleuth alongside H Rider Haggard's character Alan Quartermain of "King Solomon's Mines" fame.
It's not a terrible pairing, and the forays into magic, visions and alternative philosophies are held nicely to account by Holmes while still being an entirely plausible alternative to his scientific perspective - it's quite well handled without sacrificing Holmes and Watson's characters nor belittling Quatermain's world.
However Quartermain still derails what could have been a neat mystery - brought to them by Mrs Hudson no less, so promisingly novel a start! Worse than this, situations are resolved with gunfire rather than brains - except when Holmes weaponises both racism and body shaming to defeat a foe.
Unfortunately bringing Quartermain into the mix brings weighty issues of racism, colonialism and cultural appropriation, and the literary shortfalls of the White Saviour amongst Noble Savages - and instead of avoiding these the author tries to make clever use of them. To be fair James Lovegrove mostly succeeds at this, but it's no less of a mistake for being successful - it's often pretty distasteful.
In the end this feels like another potentially great Holmes plot with quality writing wasted for a central conceit that just doesn't work with the character.
Graphic: Gun violence, Death, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Cultural appropriation, Drug use, Chronic illness, Medical content, Ableism, Classism, Colonisation, Violence, Xenophobia, Body shaming, Animal death, Child death, Murder, Racism, Confinement, Grief, Gun violence, Torture, Gaslighting, and Kidnapping