Take a photo of a barcode or cover
kghunter's reviews
22 reviews
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
In this novel Pickhart meticulously crafted characters and relationships that are strikingly rich and complex, both beautiful and ugly. Plots that stand independent as a tree strengthened with age, yet enmeshed as the roots that anchor its surrounding forest. The extraordinary duality of her writing enabled me to submerge myself in lived experiences so different from my own that prior to I had (unbeknownst to myself) merely waded in. After reading this novel I have nothing but immense gratitude and respect for Pickhart as a literary artist.
Favorite Quotes (forgive me, there are far too many):
“All these fearless women want to kill him, he thinks. He cares for them, and he loves them, and then they kill him with worry.”
“It seems all her life Katya has either been fighting for or against the men she loves. The room they take up in her. The staggering greed. Her child. Her husband. Even her father.”
“Her heart, swelling like the moon”
“How much energy does it take to remember?”
“Pride—both a virtue and a vice.”
“You raped my country, you are a dog in heat.”
“Misha: ‘Are you angry with her?’ Katya: ‘Can I tell you something crazy?’ Misha: ‘Yes’ Katya: ‘I’m angry with everyone’”
“When we shoot we kill a neighbor. When we shoot we kill ourselves. Ukraine, the umbilical cord becomes the noose.”
“She tries not to seem worried for him, she stays angry”
“Everything is as real as it’s not”
“All these fearless women want to kill him, he thinks. He cares for them, and he loves them, and then they kill him with worry.”
“It seems all her life Katya has either been fighting for or against the men she loves. The room they take up in her. The staggering greed. Her child. Her husband. Even her father.”
“Her heart, swelling like the moon”
“How much energy does it take to remember?”
“Pride—both a virtue and a vice.”
“You raped my country, you are a dog in heat.”
“Misha: ‘Are you angry with her?’ Katya: ‘Can I tell you something crazy?’ Misha: ‘Yes’ Katya: ‘I’m angry with everyone’”
“When we shoot we kill a neighbor. When we shoot we kill ourselves. Ukraine, the umbilical cord becomes the noose.”
“She tries not to seem worried for him, she stays angry”
“Everything is as real as it’s not”
Graphic: Alcoholism, Animal death, Biphobia, Cancer, Child abuse, Child death, Chronic illness, Death, Emotional abuse, Genocide, Hate crime, Mental illness, Antisemitism, Trafficking, Kidnapping, Medical trauma, Death of parent, Lesbophobia, War
Moderate: Sexual content, Sexual violence, Terminal illness
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
In my opinion the book was very predictable, to the point that I had already correctly guessed the ending early in the story. This may have been intentional on behalf of the author because it’s not supposed to be a hard hitting thriller/mystery IMO, but a light hearted story about the beauty and joys of connecting with people from different walks of life, that was guided by an interesting “murder mystery” plot. I just wouldn’t read this if you are someone who is explicitly looking for an earnest thriller mystery novel.
Additionally I found the character development to be lacking in multiple ways. First, the character description was abysmal. Sutanto constantly reiterates the race of the characters she’s introducing which initially I found refreshing especially since she made a point to make the story racially diverse. But soon after I was slightly disappointed that there was no further description, literally all I know is that one character has brown eyes, one has a perm, and one has blonde hair. I know that detailed character physical description isn’t necessary but it seemed odd to me that Sutanto constantly reiterates everyone’s race as if that is the perfect all encompassing descriptor, when in reality it gives the reader practically nothing. When I read a story, especially one like this that is almost completely character interaction/dialogue, I find it difficult to be truly immersed in the world when I can’t envision the characters, and just giving someone’s race is like the broadest possible thing you could say about their physicality. And the author is clearly so very talented, I think her descriptions of other aspects of the story such as the tea really shown a light on her abilities so I just found myself wishing she had incorporated that a bit more into her character descriptions.
Second,
I loved the stories insight into the heart and mind of an older widow who lives a fairly isolated life. I also appreciated the authors attention to our capacity to experience sweet, platonic joy in the small everyday connections we make. I breezed through this book because the main character was so quirky and lovable, I wanted to know what she would say or do or cook or brew next! I feel like Sutanto really displayed her ability to write truly messy, funny, relatable, honest characters through Vera and I am excited to see what she writes in the future because she clearly has immense amounts of talent and potential. Not to say that she isn’t already an amazing writer, but I think she has the capacity to make some truly brilliant work as her craft ages.
favorite quotes:
“Whenever Sana visited her friends homes, especially the first generation kids, she’d often find houses filled with crumbling boxes full of stuff. Mementos from their parent’s homeland, too old to use, too precious to throw away, too painful to look at. So they’re left to age gently, a reminder of everyone who was left behind.”
“In her experience it’s best to nod and agree with what people say before doing exactly what you wanted from the very beginning.”
Moderate: Death, Violence, Death of parent, Murder
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
5.0
Also completely unrelated side note but I heard in a podcast once that Ursula K Le Guin’s father was one of the leading anthropologists that made a dehumanized spectacle of the native man Ishi that had his brain preserved as an artifact against his will after his passing. Not sure what all of the story or facts are behind the nonconsensual theft and objectification of Ishi’s remains in terms of Le Guin’s fathers involvement (I just vaguely remember a brief mention of this on a podcast I was listening to years ago) but her fathers career as an anthropologist during the early 20th century and involvement in the institutionalized observation of living indigenous peoples as some type of primitive anthropological artifact is an interesting lens to view Le Guin’s work through.
Did not finish book. Stopped at 3%.
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Child abuse, Homophobia, Racial slurs, Racism
Minor: Adult/minor relationship
5.0
The lyricism of Angelou’s work is both bold and deliberate, both gentle and alive. Regardless of the conceptual and/or theoretical depths of any which poem, she maintains a steady hold on the childlike wonder and jubilation that marks all of her work with identifying strokes.
Some of my favorite quotes from this collection include:
“History, despite its wrenching pain, cannot be unlived. And if faced with courage, need not be lived again.”
“I am not metaphor, I’m not symbol. I’m not a nightmare to vanish with the dawn. I am lasting as hunger, and certain as midnight.”
“In your absence I rehearse you.”
“You must know the difference between seeking after justice, and lusting for revenge.”
4.5
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
2.0
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
3.0
All jokes aside whilst I did enjoy the fantasy/world-building and smutty indulgence of this book, I stg I’m gonna start vomiting blood if I read another heterosexual fantasy romance novel in which the man ends up being like hundreds of years old and the girl is 16-mid twenties. I am literally on my hands and knees begging these authors to consider the impact they’re having on young women’s psyche because if I have to see another one of my young, intelligent, beautiful, compassionate friends, who are in the literally trenches fighting for their sanity against men our age who are mostly non-comital nightmares in ugly shoes and ill-fitting clothes with brains that have been shrunken via vape steam to the point that they can only regurgitate instagram and reddit comment discourse, being convinced by grown-ass fantasy novelists in the midst of their exhaustion that there is something even vaguely romantic or reprieving about the 40something year old sewage rat man-boys they’re ending up settling for. I need a BREAK and Mrs.Maas sadly ain’t givin’ it to us.
I did also break and buy the next 2 books, I will admit.
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
“[…]the truth was very costly at times. How terrible, to navigate the world without a story to comfort you.”
If you were to remove all of the sentences in this book that described one of the characters blushing, it would probably be about half its current length. I don’t know if this is just a more common experience of fair skinned people or what but I think a group-read of this in which everyone took a shot every time someone blushes would be a pretty fun way to get absolutely shittered with your friends if they also happen to be into horny fantasy mystery novels that involve a lot of quivering and clenched fists.
Blushing and quivering aside this was a truly enjoyable read. Reid is brilliant at capturing the “dark academia” imagery and I loved how she used such a beautifully painted, fantastical storyline to examine themes of misogyny, victim-shaming, childhood trauma, and isolation, as well as gender-based violence, bigotry, and oppression. As a reader who originally chose to read this book to scratch my annually occurring wintertime dark academia itch, its depth and sincerity came as a pleasant surprise.
Graphic: Adult/minor relationship, Alcoholism, Bullying, Child abuse, Death, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Mental illness, Misogyny, Panic attacks/disorders, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Kidnapping, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Gaslighting, Abandonment, Sexual harassment, Colonisation