I found the writing style to be a slog, especially since so many of the artworks in question in this book have been extensively and vibrantly covered elsewhere (recommended reading: The Last Leonardo by Ben Lewis; The Art of the Con by Anthony M. Amore; Making the Mummies Dance by Thomas Hoving.) I didn't think that the book added anything new to the conversation about these works, but it also didn't make for an interesting intro to the topic either.
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.0
Strong promise, good writing minute-to-minute (if a little over reliant on obvious tropes) but too much going on to build effective tension and horror. It felt like it was breathlessly running through the big book of phobias (“is this scary? what about this? how about this!”) and ran out of ideas. By the time the bees came up I was totally checked out of any horror. What I really wanted was for it to pick one thing and dig its claws in. The ending / resolution is the goofiest bit of all.
I genuinely enjoyed this book, as it was an informative and comprehesive history of Florence combined with a catalog of some of the greatest artistic archievements to be found within it. And, it did all this without falling into pretentious art-world cliches. I can't wait to find more by Judith Testa, what she created here was truly marvelous.
This book makes me want to visit the gallery, and what else can you say about a book that's very clearly intended as a grandiose advertisement? To be fair, the history is fairly well written, but it's not well organized, but there's some interesting information (and a very, very funny anecdote about the acquisition of one painting.) And if the evacuation of the gallery during WWII doesn't tug at your heartstrings, I don't know what to do about you.