Take a photo of a barcode or cover
pedanther's reviews
478 reviews
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
Did not finish book. Stopped at 17%.
Graphic: Gun violence, Racial slurs, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Gore, Violence, Police brutality, Antisemitism, and Alcohol
Minor: Alcoholism, Body shaming, Fatphobia, Homophobia, Infidelity, Racism, Sexual content, Torture, Toxic relationship, Excrement, Abortion, Pregnancy, War, and Classism
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.25
3.75
The author is a Christian, and from time to time gives examples of how the guidelines relate to the principles of his faith, but the guidelines themselves are grounded in our common humanity and not dependent on any religion, a fact which he recognises, and if you're not interested in those parts it's easy enough to do the readerly equivalent of nodding politely and moving on to the next bit.
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.25
One of the things that made my experience of reading it now different from reading it back then is that now I'm able to recognise the influence of some of the other authors that preceded it; in particular, there were several points that reminded me strongly of George MacDonald's work in the genre, a comparison that tended to come out to Rout's detriment. With MacDonald, you can always tell that there's some underlying pattern or purpose even when the story's apparently being arbitrary; with this book, there were occasional moments where I got the sense that the author might have some idea of what the stories were driving at, but that idea never communicated itself to me (and the book ends with an explicit refusal to offer any explanations).
Of the individual stories, my favourites were the ones featuring the family of talking bears. There's something about making a bear cub with a West Country accent the hero of a fantasy story that ensures it won't be as straightforward as a story revolving around a generic human protagonist, and these stories include most of the bits that had remained with me from my first read.
Moderate: Confinement, Racism, and Classism
Minor: Ableism, Child death, Slavery, Suicide, Violence, Xenophobia, Medical content, Grief, Cannibalism, and Injury/Injury detail
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.25
Moderate: Confinement, Medical content, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Gun violence, Racism, Islamophobia, Colonisation, and War
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
It's also quite slow to start: The first third of the book consists of brief glimpses of the protagonist's childhood mixed with explanations of the worldbuilding and backstory, before it finally settles down to a contiguous narrative around the time she turns thirteen. I struggled with the first third, but found it easier to get on after that.
Some of the worldbuilding is quite interesting, though I felt that the most interesting parts ended up feeling like window-dressing that didn't really affect a fairly familiar-seeming plot. I expect those parts will be more important in the second half of the duology, but I'm not particularly interested in reading on and finding out.
One of the features of the book is that it's interspersed with legends and scholarly articles from later centuries, showing how the key events of the protagonist's life left their mark on posterity. The first few piqued my interest, but in the aggregate I felt that they rather weighed the story down, and although I got some wry humour from the scholars' biased misrepresentations of the past, I found that the accumulation of them had the effect of making me less invested in how things turn out: how important can the details of the protagonist's life really be, when posterity will forget most of it, misunderstand the rest, and disbelieve all of it?
Moderate: Animal death, Death, Misogyny, Rape, Violence, Vomit, Grief, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Addiction, Child abuse, Child death, Confinement, Domestic abuse, Racism, Sexism, Toxic relationship, Excrement, Medical content, Dementia, Abandonment, Alcohol, Colonisation, and War
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Moderate: Infidelity, Sexism, and Classism
Minor: Domestic abuse, Physical abuse, Suicide, Grief, Death of parent, Abandonment, and Alcohol