Scan barcode
rafdee13's reviews
65 reviews
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
Mia and Pearl were more interesting but only because they weren't the fucking Richardson's. Mia herself didn't seem like much outside of a dispenser of motherly wisdom. Despite an entire section on each character meticulously telling their backstory- I feel like there wasn't much to her.
Did not finish book. Stopped at 7%.
That being said: this book feels very rough. It could've benefited from better editing, which I think was taken into consideration with "The Future is Diasabled" as it feels more complete, with better writing.
Some of my complaints are petty and closer to stylistic prefance, I'm aware of that. Some I'm a little more concerned about.
First: petty. I was listening, so when I heard "cutie bipoc" every sentence I was a little confused. Later I looked it up and saw it was actuall "QTBIPOC". As a "QTBIPOC" myself I suppose, I'm not entirely sure why this term is really used. (Latinx is also not a term I'm fond of, but that's a lot of discourse)
It also got very distracting to her "black and brown" every sentence as well. Trust me i am glad we ate talking about disability intersections with race as someone who is neurodiverse and brown, but you can say it once and construct your writing to not need to repeat the phrase every so often.
I often did not know what phrases or references meant in relation to disability justice or spaces. As I am listening at work or driving, I cannot stop to look them up. "The future is disabled" does a much better job explaining acronyms or phrases before continuing (WITH OUTLOUD CITATIONS!!). This might just be me not being the target audience though, as I am abled.
For more serious stuff: I don't like the propositioning of femmes as being the only people to do care work. I think they and women are definitely doing much of it, but a lot of the language of this book was extremely dismissive to care contributions transmascs or men of color have made to their communities.
Another thing it that is is very north American centric. Which yeah, that's where the author lives. But the disability experience of someone living in the first world is going to be difference then someone living in the third world.
5.0
Graphic: Domestic abuse, Homophobia, and Suicide
Minor: Adult/minor relationship
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
On the one hand, Atwood clearly illustrates the terrible position of women in Greek society, while also marking the difference class makes in how that misogyny is experienced. Penelope has certain expectations and roles placed on her as a noble woman, while the enslaved girls and maids have absolutely no role. They are nothing. They are the background fodder of Greek society, keeping it running while endlessly suffering under it. The 12 maids may have been killed by Odysseus's order, but it was clear from the beginning that their fate was sealed form the beginning. The chorus was a fantastic way to rebuttal Penelope, and was very effective in the audiobook.
On the other hand, I'm not sure whether to take Penelope's searing resentment of Helen as a character flaw, maybe an analysis of the madonna/whore complex and the way women are pitted against each other when shoved into it. Or instead just what it is on the surface: genuine hatred of Helen, and women like her. The weird interludes talking about the modern world were jarring, especially when taking the first person pov into account. Honestly reminded me of some deviantart fanficiton I've read before. Just...why, sometimes.
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
I recommend it, but be prepared for some repetitive and confusing aspects. As well as graphic content familiar to animal fiction like
Graphic: Ableism, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Body shaming, Bullying, Child death, Death, Gore, Misogyny, Sexism, Sexual content, Terminal illness, Blood, Vomit, Religious bigotry, Murder, Pregnancy, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism
Did not finish book. Stopped at 25%.
5.0
Graphic: Body shaming, Bullying, Cursing, Emotional abuse, Fatphobia, Mental illness, Panic attacks/disorders, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, and Gaslighting
4.0
Graphic: Body horror, Child abuse, Domestic abuse, Gore, Mental illness, Pedophilia, Physical abuse, Sexual assault, Slavery, Grief, Cultural appropriation, Colonisation, and Injury/Injury detail
5.0