Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.75
I for sure wish I would have read this in the context of a classroom discussion. I wasn't crazy about the writing style (at certain points it felt more like theory than art or fiction) but it was thought-provoking to say the least.
i found the way Hurston switched between her writers' voice and Janie's idiomatic storytelling was masterful to say the least. not only did I find myself doting on the love story between Tea Cake and Janie, but Janie's ever-evolving sense of self and assurance and the depiction of the characters as flawed and whole was very refreshing to me.
I want to note that Toni Morrison has a gift for showing rather than simply telling events in a way that tugs at you and makes every event more visceral. 10/10
This differed from a lot of first person slave narratives in the fact that it brought the perspective of a 1976 black feminist back to secure her own bloodline in the antebellum south—not only that, but it was actually decent. Butler described it as more of a "grim fantasy" than science fiction which I would agree with since the logistics of Dana's time travel was never explained, being used as more of a vehicle to explore the (lived) paradoxes of kinship, family and history (to put it broadly). Butler created a unique dialogue between the modern day African American woman and her ancestors and for that I would categorize this novel alongside Toni Morrison's Beloved as being one of the few neo-slave narratives of merit (in my opinion, most don't need to be written).
I learned a lot from this and they added a lot of useful [historical] context in the selected readings included alongside Sultana's Dream (note: I read an edition published by The Feminist Press).